back to list

Re: [tuning] Re: Carl vs. Johnny - was "Mozarts's ideas - Joe P."

🔗Patrick Grant <pg@patrickgrant.net>

12/21/2003 10:54:09 AM

> ***Hello Aaron!
>
> Actually, Johnny did conduct an experiment some time ago with
> composer Patrick Grant, and had Patrick post the results to this very
> Tuning List.
>
> /tuning/topicId_44851.html#44873
>
> best,
>
> Joseph

Just to clarify:

It was an experiment that Johnny *and I* conducted and Johnny did not *have*
me post the results to the list. It was done of my own volition after
reading the numerous posts on the subject. In fact, I hadn't talked to JR
for months prior to the posting. The adjacent ascending and descending sine
wave tones that were tested, all a single cent apart and in the C4-C5
octave, were held for *very* long durations.

regards,
Patrick Grant

🔗Joseph Pehrson <jpehrson@rcn.com>

12/21/2003 1:34:43 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Grant" <pg@p...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_50282.html#50282

> > ***Hello Aaron!
> >
> > Actually, Johnny did conduct an experiment some time ago with
> > composer Patrick Grant, and had Patrick post the results to this
very
> > Tuning List.
> >
> > /tuning/topicId_44851.html#44873
> >
> > best,
> >
> > Joseph
>
> Just to clarify:
>
> It was an experiment that Johnny *and I* conducted and Johnny did
not *have*
> me post the results to the list. It was done of my own volition
after
> reading the numerous posts on the subject. In fact, I hadn't talked
to JR
> for months prior to the posting. The adjacent ascending and
descending sine
> wave tones that were tested, all a single cent apart and in the C4-
C5
> octave, were held for *very* long durations.
>
> regards,
> Patrick Grant

***Thanks, Patrick, for the clarification. For some reason I thought
that Johnny urged that the experiment be posted since people kept
repeating for a scientific proof. Guess I was wrong...

JP