bounced mess #4

ADVERTISEMENT

/tuning/topicId_45986.html#45986

> For those of you, like me, who are wondering "How did he do it!!??",
> we have this info from Mark Johnson, the engineer for Chrysalid
> Requiem...
>
> http://www.panix.com/~mj/reqrec.html
>
> Here's an article about CR based on the above info...
>
> http://www.garyeskow.com/interviews/inter8p1.html
>
> ...a Grammy nomination??!! Totally awesome. Everyone go buy
> this now...
>

***Actually, I did a few weeks ago and it sits prominently in my
apartment. It's an obvious masterwork as well as great technical
achievement.

J. Pehrson

It has some advantages for the list if reposted messages could be posted
exactly as they were originally posted, especially: with the original
title.

In most email programs you can do this by simply selecting your saved
message (not the bounce) and resending it.

This only works however if your email program is set to save all sent
messages in a folder. Otherwise you have more work to do, but still,
recreating the exact title will make it much easier when searching for
threads.

Of course matching the original is no issue if a new thread was being
started with the post that was bounced. Nonetheless a meaningful title is
helpful, as always.

Thanks to everyone who is reposting.

-Kurt Bigler

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_46429.html#46440

> Of course matching the original is no issue if a new thread was
being
> started with the post that was bounced. Nonetheless a meaningful
title is
> helpful, as always.
>
> Thanks to everyone who is reposting.
>
> -Kurt Bigler

***Sorry, Kurt,

I didn't really have them, since I posted from the Web. I guess
they're somewhere on the returned messages which I got back as email.

As far as the *search engine* goes, however, it won't matter, since
the posts will come up according to the text string selected... so
the title really doesn't matter all that much...

Joseph Pehrson