back to list

This new crappy Yahoo interface

🔗Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org>

3/25/2005 6:17:38 PM

Can anyone tell me if it is still possible to go to a message number,
and if so, how?

🔗Dave Seidel <dave@superluminal.com>

3/25/2005 6:30:46 PM

Hmmm, I don't much like it either, at first glance. But getting to an individual message seems straight-forward. Your message, number 57757 is at /tuning/topicId_57757.html#57757. So at least the URLs aren't arcane.

- Dave

Gene Ward Smith wrote:
> > Can anyone tell me if it is still possible to go to a message number,
> and if so, how?

🔗monz <monz@tonalsoft.com>

3/25/2005 6:40:01 PM

and how did our list membership suddenly jump by
over 200 people? it went from 775 before the interface
change to 989 now.

-monz

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Dave Seidel <dave@s...> wrote:
> Hmmm, I don't much like it either, at first glance. But
> getting to an individual message seems straight-forward.
> Your message, number 57757 is at
> /tuning/topicId_57757.html#57757.
> So at least the URLs aren't arcane.
>
> - Dave
>
>
> Gene Ward Smith wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if it is still possible to go to a
> > message number,
> > and if so, how?

🔗Joseph Pehrson <jpehrson@rcn.com>

3/27/2005 4:43:47 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote:
>
> Can anyone tell me if it is still possible to go to a message number,
> and if so, how?

***It didn't work for me. Maybe they haven't *ironed out* this one
yet. When did this take place? How many days ago (it's Easter Sunday
now...)

Thanks!

J. Pehrson

🔗Joseph Pehrson <jpehrson@rcn.com>

3/29/2005 9:15:16 AM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...>
wrote:
>
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...>
wrote:
> >
> > Can anyone tell me if it is still possible to go to a message
number,
> > and if so, how?
>
>
> ***It didn't work for me. Maybe they haven't *ironed out* this
one
> yet. When did this take place? How many days ago (it's Easter
Sunday
> now...)
>
> Thanks!
>
> J. Pehrson

***It looks as though, in the middle of one of the nights,
they "fixed" this... with previous messages actually *being*
previous, etc. Also, a new box for searching message numbers.... Or
am I just dreaming...?

J. Pehrson