horagrams on Monz site

I note that Paul Erlich's temperament horagrams are not on, or
linked to, the Monz dictionary site. I think that would be
valuable, since they seem like an important contribution...

J. Pehrson

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...> wrote:

> I note that Paul Erlich's temperament horagrams are not on, or
> linked to, the Monz dictionary site.

He said here that he wanted to include them but then didn't follow
up. I don't think he even saw any of the 7-limit horagrams, which I
posted more recently. But see below.

> I think that would be
> valuable, since they seem like an important contribution...
>
> J. Pehrson

Well there are hundreds of other things I've asked Monz to correct
and/or add, but he's not only been super-busy with his software, he
was also very ill recently. We also should consider that Monz's
endeavor is now a *corporate* one (and I believe strongly in his
rights as a capitalist, so long as he goes about it honestly), so it
will be serving a different set of interests than an "enthusiast"
site would. In the meantime, the horagrams are easily accessible, I
can create new ones easily according to any specifications, and they
can be put on any website as far as I'm concerned . . . I think for
now, we should stick to sending Monz our best wishes for his health
and his software.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus" <paul@s...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_52624.html#52626

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...>
wrote:
>
> > I note that Paul Erlich's temperament horagrams are not on, or
> > linked to, the Monz dictionary site.
>
> He said here that he wanted to include them but then didn't follow
> up. I don't think he even saw any of the 7-limit horagrams, which I
> posted more recently. But see below.
>
> > I think that would be
> > valuable, since they seem like an important contribution...
> >
> > J. Pehrson
>
> Well there are hundreds of other things I've asked Monz to correct
> and/or add, but he's not only been super-busy with his software, he
> was also very ill recently. We also should consider that Monz's
> endeavor is now a *corporate* one (and I believe strongly in his
> rights as a capitalist, so long as he goes about it honestly), so
it
> will be serving a different set of interests than an "enthusiast"
> site would. In the meantime, the horagrams are easily accessible, I
> can create new ones easily according to any specifications, and
they
> can be put on any website as far as I'm concerned . . . I think for
> now, we should stick to sending Monz our best wishes for his health
> and his software.

***That makes sense... Hope you're feeling better, Monz! (I didn't
realize anything was wrong...)

JP

hi Joe, paul, and everyone else,

yes, i was very ill for 2 weeks, with a viral sinus infection
on top of which i also got the flu. i got rid of the flu
pretty quickly (but it was horrible), but the sinus infection
still won't let go. but at least i've been able to go back
to work this week. i'm doing much better now.

i have a lot of work to do to correct and finish updating
the Dictionary, but i'm also very busy with the software,
so work on the website will take time.

thanks for the well-wishes.

-monz

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...> wrote:
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus" <paul@s...>
wrote:
>
> /tuning/topicId_52624.html#52626
>
> > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...>
> wrote:
> >
> > > I note that Paul Erlich's temperament horagrams are not on, or
> > > linked to, the Monz dictionary site.
> >
> > He said here that he wanted to include them but then didn't
follow
> > up. I don't think he even saw any of the 7-limit horagrams, which
I
> > posted more recently. But see below.
> >
> > > I think that would be
> > > valuable, since they seem like an important contribution...
> > >
> > > J. Pehrson
> >
> > Well there are hundreds of other things I've asked Monz to
correct
> > and/or add, but he's not only been super-busy with his software,
he
> > was also very ill recently. We also should consider that Monz's
> > endeavor is now a *corporate* one (and I believe strongly in his
> > rights as a capitalist, so long as he goes about it honestly), so
> it
> > will be serving a different set of interests than an "enthusiast"
> > site would. In the meantime, the horagrams are easily accessible,
I
> > can create new ones easily according to any specifications, and
> they
> > can be put on any website as far as I'm concerned . . . I think
for
> > now, we should stick to sending Monz our best wishes for his
health
> > and his software.
>
>
> ***That makes sense... Hope you're feeling better, Monz! (I didn't
> realize anything was wrong...)
>
> JP