winamp working quite nicely!

I'm quite happy with winamp (ver 5, which was the most obvious to
download from the site).

It sounds great, plays mp3s just great and has a little equalizer in
there, as well as many other feature.

And it also plays .oggs just fine.

I think Jon Szanto deserves most of the credit for straightening us
out about this player...

Anyway, I'm no longer .ogg clueless, so what was I supposed to be
listening to again...?? :)

J. Pehrson

Joe,

Glad it is working out for you.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...> wrote:
> I think Jon Szanto deserves most of the credit for straightening us
> out about this player...

And I'll defer kudos back to Carl, who a long time ago prodded me into making sure I had a newer WinAmp version (I'd been using it for a number of years) to allow for .ogg files.

> Anyway, I'm no longer .ogg clueless, so what was I supposed to be
> listening to again...?? :)

Music.

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...> wrote:

> Anyway, I'm no longer .ogg clueless, so what was I supposed to be
> listening to again...?? :)

http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/gene.html

Not to mention the rest of the site.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_52444.html#52447

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...>
wrote:
>
> > Anyway, I'm no longer .ogg clueless, so what was I supposed to be
> > listening to again...?? :)
>
> http://66.98.148.43/~xenharmo/gene.html
>
> Not to mention the rest of the site.

***Oh sure... I searched and went to that page right away! That's
how I tested my .oggability.... Great job, Gene. You're a real "wild
man..." The "unusual" tunings are very inspiring.

I guess I meant, though, that there was going to, ultimately, be some
kind of Blackjack study, one with TOP temperament and one without,
apparently. Probably that isn't ready yet...

Thanks!

JP

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...> wrote:

> I guess I meant, though, that there was going to, ultimately, be
some
> kind of Blackjack study, one with TOP temperament and one without,
> apparently. Probably that isn't ready yet...

I backed up some of my scores, but I haven't found a backup for the
two Blackjack pieces in the wake of a crash a while back.