What Else Will Fit In Me?

I am a very open to experimenting type of girl, I have tried to get off with just about anything and everything that will fit in me and possibly get me off. I am very multiorgasmic and would like some suggestions of what I can slide into me.

Please contact me via www.AltSexfinder.com/landing.asp?afl=TYHO That should take you directly to my profile where you can email me if you have suggestions of what you think I should sit on. If you have to register for the free trial like I did a long time ago... Just search for my screen name "badbaecky".

sallyonsxualhigh3 wrote:

>I am a very open to experimenting type of girl, I have tried to get off with just about anything and everything that will fit in me and possibly get me off. I am very multiorgasmic and would like some suggestions of what I can slide into me.
>
>Please contact me via www.AltSexfinder.com/landing.asp?afl=TYHO That should take you directly to my profile where you can email me if you have suggestions of what you think I should sit on. If you have to register for the free trial like I did a long time ago... Just search for my screen name "badbaecky".
>

How about a Bass Marimba or maybe a Dream House installation?

--
* David Beardsley
* microtonal guitar
* http://biink.com/db

Back when the list died for a couple of weeks, did anyone succeed in
contacting our list's owner?

If so, can you ask him to appoint some moderators who actually read
the list and might clean it up occasionally.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Keenan" <d.keenan@b...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_47416.html#47433

> Back when the list died for a couple of weeks, did anyone succeed in
> contacting our list's owner?
>
> If so, can you ask him to appoint some moderators who actually read
> the list and might clean it up occasionally.

***This has been an ongoing problem, and I can't understand why Mark
Nowitzky doesn't appoint some assisting "moderators" to keep things
in order, since he obviously isn't reading it.

The young lady who needed the slide trombone was surely out of place,
despite, I'm sure, the sincerity of her wishes...

J. Pehrson

Joseph Pehrson wrote:

>--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Dave Keenan" <d.keenan@b...> wrote:
>
>/tuning/topicId_47416.html#47433
>
> >
>>Back when the list died for a couple of weeks, did anyone succeed in
>>contacting our list's owner? >>
>>If so, can you ask him to appoint some moderators who actually read
>>the list and might clean it up occasionally.
>> >>
>
>
>***This has been an ongoing problem, and I can't understand why Mark >Nowitzky doesn't appoint some assisting "moderators" to keep things >in order, since he obviously isn't reading it.
>
>The young lady who needed the slide trombone was surely out of place, >despite, I'm sure, the sincerity of her wishes...
>
>J. Pehrson
>

http://nowitzky.hypermart.net/

Someone in the LA area could also look him up
in the phone book and give him a ring.

--
* David Beardsley
* microtonal guitar
* http://biink.com/db

sorry to be the harbringer of bad news, but there's really little a
moderator could do about this, short of individually reviewing every
potential new member for "sincerity" -- a daunting and controversial
task. other lists i'm on have moderators who immediately unsubscribe
spammers, but these spam e-mail addresses rarely exist long enough
for that to have any effect.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
> sorry to be the harbringer of bad news, but there's really little a
> moderator could do about this, short of individually reviewing every
> potential new member for "sincerity" -- a daunting and controversial
> task. other lists i'm on have moderators who immediately unsubscribe
> spammers, but these spam e-mail addresses rarely exist long enough
> for that to have any effect.

Incorrect - there are things that can be done. As moderator of MMM, I got fed up with spambots making it through, so I changed membership to 'approve'. All the time it takes me is to either check off approval for someone that appears *obviously* to be a real person, or if I'm not sure I simply drop them a line and ask what their interest in microtonality is; when they write back I thank them profusely for the extra hassle and approve them.

Since changing to this I have not had one spam get through to the list successfully - zip, zero, nada. It is just what I consider part of moderating on these Yahoo lists these days.

Yeah, it's a hassle. Such is our world.

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Szanto" <JSZANTO@A...> wrote:
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
> > sorry to be the harbringer of bad news, but there's really little
a
> > moderator could do about this, short of individually reviewing
every
> > potential new member for "sincerity" -- a daunting and
controversial
> > task. other lists i'm on have moderators who immediately
unsubscribe
> > spammers, but these spam e-mail addresses rarely exist long
enough
> > for that to have any effect.
>
> Incorrect

so i take it you're volunteering?

> - there are things that can be done. As moderator of MMM, >I got
>fed up with spambots making it through, so I changed >membership
>to 'approve'. All the time it takes me is to either check >off
>approval for someone that appears *obviously* to be a real >person,
>or if I'm not sure I simply drop them a line and ask what >their
>interest in microtonality is; when they write back I thank >them
>profusely for the extra hassle and approve them.

that's exactly what i was referring to as a "daunting and
controversial task" above. i would have no qualms if mark wanted to
assign you to this task, and you were willing to take it on.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
> > Incorrect
>
> so i take it you're volunteering?

No, I'm pointing out that it isn't daunting, and I can't for the life of me figure what would be controversial, at least in my case. I started a group, I've made clear how we'd like to see things be, and when the waters started becoming muddy I've done what I can to clear them up. I haven't stopped *anyone* from joining except for non-humans - the automated spam msgs.

> i would have no qualms if mark wanted to
> assign you to this task, and you were willing to take it on.

Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I have enough net-related tasks monitoring one discussion groups and 3 web sites. I suggest, since I've shown it isn't all that burdensome, that Mark appoint another moderator and let them monitor the flow. Or nuke/move this puppy.

Maybe *you* could volunteer?

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Szanto" <JSZANTO@A...> wrote:
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
> > > Incorrect
> >
> > so i take it you're volunteering?
>
> No, I'm pointing out that it isn't daunting, and I can't for the
>life of me figure what would be controversial, at least in my case.
>I started a group, I've made clear how we'd like to see things be,
>and when the waters started becoming muddy I've done what I can to
>clear them up. I haven't stopped *anyone* from joining except for
>non-humans - the automated spam msgs.
>
> > i would have no qualms if mark wanted to
> > assign you to this task, and you were willing to take it on.
>
> Thanks for the vote of confidence, but I have enough net-related
>tasks monitoring one discussion groups and 3 web sites.

then it *is* daunting to some degree.

> I suggest, since I've shown it isn't all that burdensome, that Mark
>appoint another moderator and let them monitor the flow. Or
>nuke/move this puppy.
>
> Maybe *you* could volunteer?

sure, but *that* i think would be controversial, given the number of
list members that have made very serious accusations about my
character in the past (especially two members or ex-members who we
haven't heard from in a very long time). and it would still be
daunting, given that i can be away from the list without web access
for indefinite periods of time, which will be happening more and more
in the coming years.

the best solution would be for mark to assign *multiple* (unanimously
acceptable) moderators, so that any prospective member would have
only a short wait before membership is approved. that's the way it
works on the tuning-files list, for example.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus" <paul@s...> wrote:
> then it *is* daunting to some degree.

Nah, that just devalues the word. The task itself is not a problem, all you need is someone with a little bit of time. If someone doesn't already do a bunch of this stuff, it isn't a daunting task in the least.

If I used "daunting" the way you are, I'd find the task (i.e. finding the time to do it) of washing the dishes out there in the sink "daunting"! :)

Of course I could shut off the computer, which is going to happen now, as my percussion student is here...

> sure, but *that* i think would be controversial

Yeah, and I think *I'd* fall into that category here as well ("Szanto's going to weed out all the mathematicians!") :)

> the best solution would be for mark to assign *multiple*
> (unanimously acceptable) moderators

Well, this list can't agree on anything. You KNOW that. But I think that is a good way to go, and it's my last word on the subject...

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:

> sorry to be the harbringer of bad news, but there's really little a
> moderator could do about this, short of individually reviewing
every
> potential new member for "sincerity" -- a daunting and
controversial
> task.

They could cancel the message and unsubscribe the messenger, and it
is absurd not to have someone available who will do that.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus" <paul@s...> wrote:

> the best solution would be for mark to assign *multiple*
(unanimously
> acceptable) moderators, so that any prospective member would have
> only a short wait before membership is approved. that's the way it
> works on the tuning-files list, for example.

Good idea, if only someone can find Mark.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Gene Ward Smith" <gwsmith@s...> wrote:
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "wallyesterpaulrus" <paul@s...>
wrote:
>
> > the best solution would be for mark to assign *multiple*
> (unanimously
> > acceptable) moderators, so that any prospective member would have
> > only a short wait before membership is approved. that's the way
it
> > works on the tuning-files list, for example.
>
> Good idea, if only someone can find Mark.

Hi gang! Sorry for my absence. Believe it or not, I just got back
from Bulgaria and Greece after a 25-day vacation. (I've brought back
some new music CD's to listen to.)

Re: multiple moderators, I agree that it's worth a try. The most
active tuning list participants are especially suited to the task.
Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
this group. (I'm totally backed up on my email, thanks to my
vacation and of course spam.) So I'll try to keep a better eye on
the list for the next few days.

--Mark Nowitzky, tuning-owner@yahoogroups.com

P.S.: As a slide trombone player myself, after reviewing previous
posts, it was good to see that once again the slide trombone proves
to be the most versatile instrument.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...> wrote:

> Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
> this group.

I'll volunteer.

on 10/9/03 4:10 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org> wrote:

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...> wrote:
>
>
>> Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
>> this group.
>
> I'll volunteer.

Hmm. Multiple monitors. Does this mean they take turns, or that multiple
rejections are required to reject a message?

-Kurt

>
>
>
>
> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@yahoogroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@yahoogroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
> the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@yahoogroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest mode.
> tuning-normal@yahoogroups.com - change your subscription to individual emails.
> tuning-help@yahoogroups.com - receive general help information.
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:

> Hmm. Multiple monitors. Does this mean they take turns, or that
multiple
> rejections are required to reject a message?

Moderators have the powers list owners grant them, but if axing a
posting isn't included there isn't much point.

on 10/9/03 5:13 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org> wrote:

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:
>
>> Hmm. Multiple monitors. Does this mean they take turns, or that
> multiple
>> rejections are required to reject a message?
>
> Moderators have the powers list owners grant them, but if axing a
> posting isn't included there isn't much point.

Just didn't know what it meant.

Are messages delayed to be moderated? Or are they only axed from the
archives? Or are only messages from non-members moderated? I have seen
this before.

Kurt Bigler wrote:

>on 10/9/03 5:13 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org> wrote:
>
> >
>>--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>>Hmm. Multiple monitors. Does this mean they take turns, or that
>>> >>>
>>multiple
>> >>
>>>rejections are required to reject a message?
>>> >>>
>>Moderators have the powers list owners grant them, but if axing a
>>posting isn't included there isn't much point.
>> >>
>
>Just didn't know what it meant.
>
>Are messages delayed to be moderated? Or are they only axed from the
>archives? Or are only messages from non-members moderated? I have seen
>this before.
>

Moderating would be about approving new members. Forget about axing posts!
Look at the email address of the recent spammers - it couldn't be that
hard to spot them!!!!!!!!!!

--
* David Beardsley
* microtonal guitar
* http://biink.com/db

Mark (and others),

You may not be aware that you can set the group so that only messages
from new members need to be approved. You don't have to approve all
memberships, and you don't have to approve all messages.

I suggest you make this setting immediately. It's buried in the bowels
of list owners' user interface. Here's the sequence:

Management
Messages
Posting and Archives - Edit
Posting Options - Moderation - New members
Save Changes

And then you might delete all the recent porn advertisements from the
archives, first unsubscribing their posters.

I strongly suggest Paul Erlich be made a moderator, since he's such a
reliable reader of the list.

Other questions about how it's going to work with multiple moderators
can probably best be answered by just trying it.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, David Beardsley <db@b...> wrote:

> Moderating would be about approving new members. Forget about axing
posts!

Posts from "Cuntface" are so valuable to tuning theory they should be
preserved?

Gene Ward Smith wrote:

>--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, David Beardsley <db@b...> wrote:
>
> >
>>Moderating would be about approving new members. Forget about axing >> >>
>posts!
>
>Posts from "Cuntface" are so valuable to tuning theory they should be >preserved?
>
Probably not, but this isn't about censorship. It's about moderation.

--
* David Beardsley
* microtonal guitar
* http://biink.com/db

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, David Beardsley <db@b...> wrote:

> Probably not, but this isn't about censorship. It's about
moderation.

Censorship?? You think clearly off the cuntface posts is censorship?

on 10/9/03 4:10 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org> wrote:

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...> wrote:
>
>
>> Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
>> this group.
>
> I'll volunteer.

Days(?) later, I just "got" the joke in the subject and its relationship to
the "was" subject. Sometimes I'm slow. (Or is that just a freudian slip of
my own?)

-Kurt

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_47416.html#47796

>
> --Mark Nowitzky, tuning-owner@yahoogroups.com
>

***I'd be happy to help...

J. Pehrson

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_47416.html#47814

> on 10/9/03 4:10 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@s...> wrote:
>
> > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...>
wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
> >> this group.
> >
> > I'll volunteer.
>
>
> Days(?) later, I just "got" the joke in the subject and its
relationship to
> the "was" subject. Sometimes I'm slow. (Or is that just a
freudian slip of
> my own?)
>
> -Kurt

***I think Dave was having a little clever fun at *our* expense,
since I didn't get the joke until right now, either...

J. Pehrson

Joseph Pehrson wrote:

>--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:
>
>/tuning/topicId_47416.html#47814
>
> >
>>on 10/9/03 4:10 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@s...> wrote:
>>
>> >>
>>>--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...> >>> >>>
>wrote:
> >
>>> >>>
>>>>Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
>>>>this group.
>>>> >>>>
>>>I'll volunteer.
>>> >>>
>>Days(?) later, I just "got" the joke in the subject and its >> >>
>relationship to
> >
>>the "was" subject. Sometimes I'm slow. (Or is that just a >> >>
>freudian slip of
> >
>>my own?)
>>
>>-Kurt
>> >>
>
>
>***I think Dave was having a little clever fun at *our* expense, >since I didn't get the joke until right now, either...
>

Oh...my original comments to the "What Else Will Fit In Me?" spam?

Just a twisted response to the the spam, I kinda regretted it
after I sent it. But the spammer was SO off topic, I just tried to
make her part of the gang....probablly insulting any PC types
and women on the list: sorry 'bout that folks!

I could make the excuse that I'm under a bit of stress,
but I would have made the comment anyways.....;)

--
* David Beardsley
* microtonal guitar
* http://biink.com/db

on 10/11/03 5:00 PM, David Beardsley <db@biink.com> wrote:

> Joseph Pehrson wrote:
>
>> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:
>>
>> /tuning/topicId_47416.html#47814
>>
>>
>>
>>> on 10/9/03 4:10 PM, Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@s...> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mark Nowitzky" <nowitzky@f...>
>>>>
>>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Any volunteers might best get ahold of me by posting a message to
>>>>> this group.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> I'll volunteer.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Days(?) later, I just "got" the joke in the subject and its
>>>
>>>
>> relationship to
>>
>>
>>> the "was" subject. Sometimes I'm slow. (Or is that just a
>>>
>>>
>> freudian slip of
>>
>>
>>> my own?)
>>>
>>> -Kurt
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ***I think Dave was having a little clever fun at *our* expense,
>> since I didn't get the joke until right now, either...
>>
>
> Oh...my original comments to the "What Else Will Fit In Me?" spam?
>
> Just a twisted response to the the spam, I kinda regretted it
> after I sent it. But the spammer was SO off topic, I just tried to
> make her part of the gang....probablly insulting any PC types

I don't get how you were insulting PC types, but then I'm not a PC type, so
maybe I wouldn't notice. (I always say, why buy a computer when you could
have a Macintosh. But apple is working on proving me wrong, by making the
OS X Finder into a box of little insults. Scuze my off-topic.)

But we were just talking about the subject - I don't have your original
comments anymore - maybe that's where the PC insult was.

> and women on the list: sorry 'bout that folks!
>
> I could make the excuse that I'm under a bit of stress,
> but I would have made the comment anyways.....;)

Um, Kurt...

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:
> I don't get how you were insulting PC types, but then I'm not a PC type, so
> maybe I wouldn't notice. (I always say, why buy a computer when you could
> have a Macintosh.

Either your tongue is planted firmly in your cheek, or you completely misread David - I'm sure the "PC" he was referring to was "politically correct", not the hardware/software platform.

Cheers,
Jon

Hi, Jon.

Would you please stop
posting this off-topic stuff.

Bill

=========================================

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Jon Szanto" <JSZANTO@A...> wrote:
> Um, Kurt...
>
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kurt Bigler <kkb@b...> wrote:
> > I don't get how you were insulting PC types, but then I'm not a
PC type, so
> > maybe I wouldn't notice. (I always say, why buy a computer when
you could
> > have a Macintosh.
>
> Either your tongue is planted firmly in your cheek, or you
completely misread David - I'm sure the "PC" he was referring to
was "politically correct", not the hardware/software platform.
>
> Cheers,
> Jon