new decimal-based Blackjack notation

I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
full decimal glory.

Hopefully this link will take you right to the notation:
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack..htm#notation

If not, you can find it easily enough from here:
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack.htm

love / peace / harmony ...

-monz
http://www.monz.org
"All roads lead to n^0"

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Oops... my bad.

> From: monz <joemonz@yahoo.com>
> To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:30 AM
> Subject: [tuning] new decimal-based Blackjack notation
>
> I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
> Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
> Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
> that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
> to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
> away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
> full decimal glory.

Here are the correct links:

Hopefully this link will take you right to the notation:
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack..htm#notation

If not, you can find it easily enough from here:
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack..htm

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

Oh my goodness, this is not my day.
Let's try this one last time...

Hopefully this link will take you right to the notation:
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack.htm#notation

If not, you can find it easily enough from here:
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack.htm

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

In-Reply-To: <002a01c16cff$d675f700$af48620c@dsl.att.net>
monz wrote:

> I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
> Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
> Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
> that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
> to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
> away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
> full decimal glory.

It looks like what I describe at
<http://x31eq.com/decimal_notation.htm> but with a line taken
out. What's the rationale for removing that line?

Graham

Hi Graham,

> From: <graham@microtonal.co.uk>
> To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 6:28 AM
> Subject: [tuning] Re: new decimal-based Blackjack notation
>
>
> In-Reply-To: <002a01c16cff$d675f700$af48620c@dsl.att.net>
> monz wrote:
>
> > I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
> > Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
> > Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
> > that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
> > to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
> > away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
> > full decimal glory.
>
> It looks like what I describe at
> <http://x31eq.com/decimal_notation.htm> but with a line taken
> out. What's the rationale for removing that line?

Staves can be stacked to cover a several-"8ve" range.

I realized *after* I added that to my webpage how closely
it resembled your own notation. Sorry... didn't mean to
infringe.

love / peace / harmony ...

-monz
http://www.monz.org
"All roads lead to n^0"

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_30155.html#30155

> I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
> Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
> Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
> that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
> to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
> away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
> full decimal glory.
>
> Hopefully this link will take you right to the notation:
> http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack..htm#notation
>
> If not, you can find it easily enough from here:
> http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack.htm
>

he he... Neither of these links worked for me... ha ha... :) :)

JP

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_30155.html#30157

>
> Oops... my bad.
>
> > From: monz <joemonz@y...>
> > To: <tuning@y...>
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 3:30 AM
> > Subject: [tuning] new decimal-based Blackjack notation
> >
> > I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
> > Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
> > Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
> > that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
> > to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
> > away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
> > full decimal glory.
>
>
> Here are the correct links:
>
>
> Hopefully this link will take you right to the notation:
>
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack..htm#notation
>
> If not, you can find it easily enough from here:
> http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack..htm
>

Monz...

These links are still not working.

I get:

http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/blackjack/blackjack.htm

Looks like there somehow is an extra "period" in yours... ??

Joe

--- In tuning@y..., graham@m... wrote:

/tuning/topicId_30155.html#30160

> In-Reply-To: <002a01c16cff$d675f700$af48620c@d...>
> monz wrote:
>
> > I read the exchange here between Joe Pehrson and
> > Dave Keenan, regarding Blackjack notation, with interest.
> > Then I came up with a very elegant idea for notating Blackjack
> > that I thought might work really well. I know Joe wants
> > to retain the relationship with 12-EDO, but this does
> > away with it completely and so presents Blackjack in
> > full decimal glory.
>
> It looks like what I describe at
> <http://x31eq.com/decimal_notation.htm> but with a line
taken
> out. What's the rationale for removing that line?
>
>
> Graham

Most probably it looks too much like "real music" that way! :)

JP

Might it be time to update your homepage?

http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/josephpehrson/tuning.html

--- In tuning@y..., "Paul Erlich" <paul@s...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_30155.html#30196

> Might it be time to update your homepage?
>
> http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/josephpehrson/tuning.html

Hmmm. You bet, I'll probably change this now...

JP