Hangin' out

Paul and Joseph here . . .

Paul:

We're having fun studying Graham Breed's Blackjack progression --
playing it on the keyboard, mapping it on the lattice . . .

Joseph:

This is TERRIFIC, since we can find a WHOLE NEW harmony in these
methods.... Got it!

We need to STANDARDIZE the notation, however...

Come on, Monz!!!

--- In tuning@y..., jpehrson@r... wrote:

/tuning/topicId_23913.html#23913

> Paul and Joseph here . . .
>
> Paul:
>
> We're having fun studying Graham Breed's Blackjack progression --
> playing it on the keyboard, mapping it on the lattice . . .
>
> Joseph:
>
> This is TERRIFIC, since we can find a WHOLE NEW harmony in these
> methods.... Got it!
>
> We need to STANDARDIZE the notation, however...
>
> Come on, Monz!!!

Hey, my suggestions for standardized 72-EDO notation are
amply documented in the archives of this list. And the
more I think about it, the less likely I am to chuck it
and join the rest of you. Sorry. I've already been using
it in my own scores and I'm not going to rewrite them now.

(Wish I could have been in NYC to join in the fun! Well...
actually I had quite a remarkable weekend myself. Hasn't
anyone here even *mentioned* the Partch centennial celebration
at UCLA on Saturday?... and that was just the beginning of
my holiday fun!...)

-monz
http://www.monz.org
"All roads lead to n^0"

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> Hasn't anyone here even *mentioned* the Partch centennial
> celebration at UCLA on Saturday?

Give 'us' a bit of a break, Joe! Some of 'us' were still in LA,
breaking down displays and collecting instruments, and today was the
first day of a breather in weeks. See the post I just uploaded, and
I'll have a roundup on the site by mid-week.

The Partch site that is, http://www.corporeal.com/ otherwise known as
Corporeal Meadows, for those of you who didn't know. Lots to come in
the next few weeks...

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@y..., JSZANTO@A... wrote:

/tuning/topicId_23913.html#23926

> --- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> > Hasn't anyone here even *mentioned* the Partch centennial
> > celebration at UCLA on Saturday?
>
> Give 'us' a bit of a break, Joe! Some of 'us' were still
> in LA, breaking down displays and collecting instruments,
> and today was the first day of a breather in weeks. See the
> post I just uploaded, and I'll have a roundup on the site
> by mid-week.

Hi Jon,

Sorry if it seemed that I offended you... that was certainly
not my intent. Was just a bit surprised that in 100 or so
posts that I received since seeing you Saturday, no-one here,
until your post came along, has said anything about it.
Looking forward to the recap on Corporeal Meadows. It was
a special treat to see/hear and meet Bob Gilmore.

(*Very* sorry that I missed the presentation given by you
and Danlee. If I had driven up myself, as originally intended,
I would have caught the entire day.)

-monz
http://www.monz.org
"All roads lead to n^0"

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> Sorry if it seemed that I offended you... that was certainly
> not my intent.

No, Joe, not at all! I wasn't bent out of shape or anything, and the
quotes were just an afterthought! No offense taken...

> Was just a bit surprised that in 100 or so
> posts that I received since seeing you Saturday, no-one here,
> until your post came along, has said anything about it.

Maybe they weren't there. Of the people I actually know from this
list, the only one I actually recognized and talked to (besides
yourself) was Bill Alves, and he's on "holiday" from the list for now.

> Looking forward to the recap on Corporeal Meadows. It was
> a special treat to see/hear and meet Bob Gilmore.

He's a gem, no?

> (*Very* sorry that I missed the presentation given by you
> and Danlee. If I had driven up myself, as originally intended,
> I would have caught the entire day.)

Won't be the last time, and we're going to do a multimedia version
for the site in the near future. It was great fun to do with 5 other
Partch veterans (including Emil Richards) and will be refined and
performed again...

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_23913.html#23923

>
> --- In tuning@y..., jpehrson@r... wrote:
>
> /tuning/topicId_23913.html#23913
>
> > Paul and Joseph here . . .
> >
> > Paul:
> >
> > We're having fun studying Graham Breed's Blackjack progression --
> > playing it on the keyboard, mapping it on the lattice . . .
> >
> > Joseph:
> >
> > This is TERRIFIC, since we can find a WHOLE NEW harmony in these
> > methods.... Got it!
> >
> > We need to STANDARDIZE the notation, however...
> >
> > Come on, Monz!!!
>
>
> Hey, my suggestions for standardized 72-EDO notation are
> amply documented in the archives of this list. And the
> more I think about it, the less likely I am to chuck it
> and join the rest of you. Sorry. I've already been using
> it in my own scores and I'm not going to rewrite them now.
>
> (Wish I could have been in NYC to join in the fun! Well...
> actually I had quite a remarkable weekend myself. Hasn't
> anyone here even *mentioned* the Partch centennial celebration
> at UCLA on Saturday?... and that was just the beginning of
> my holiday fun!...)
>
>
>
> -monz
> http://www.monz.org
> "All roads lead to n^0"

Hi Monz...

Yes, that would have been fun if you had been there and Reinhard had
been in the country too... like last time!

Sorry you can't "convert..." I understand your feelings since you've
been working with this so long.

Anyway, we'll have to carefully use "legends" then..

I believe Erlich, Keenan and I will be using the "revised" notation...

Dave Keenan seems to be accepting it...

best,

________ ______ _____
Joseph Pehrson