Re: John deLaubenfels: New FAQ man!

[Joseph Pehrson:]
>I would like to accept John delaubenfels offer to be our big "FAQ
>MAN." Formal music education is no obstacle, it is, unfortunately,
>an ASSET!

Yeeeeeow: what that me who said I'd do it this morning? I won't back
out if no one else volunteers, but let's give others a chance to step
forward. Joe, I understand you to mean that _lack_ of formal music
education is no obstacle, and perhaps that's true, within limits,
especially if FAQ entries are subject to the scrutiny of the many list
members who know a shootload more than I do about so much of music
history and practice.

>And, Robert Walker as "technical supervisor" with the new Web-tree
>method... "bells and whistles" galore!

I get dizzy just reading Robert's posts on the subject, but will try
to understand more of what he's saying by going to his example place.
Robert, you don't want to volunteer to be FAQ-man?

>Yes?? Do we need a full vote?? I rather doubt it, unless there is
>some serious objection since, I believe there is only ONE candidate
>running for office!!!!

>Conscientious objectors please step forward!

Yeah, it's not too late to object, everyone! BTW, I'll be out of town
all next week, but this is a project that'll take much longer than a
week to get even into first functional draft mode, much less polish.

JdL

--- In tuning@y..., "John A. deLaubenfels" <jdl@a...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_19609.html#19609

>
> Yeeeeeow: what that me who said I'd do it this morning? I won't
back out if no one else volunteers, but let's give others a chance to
step forward.

Uh huh. We're going to see quite some "stampede," I guarantee it...

>
> >And, Robert Walker as "technical supervisor" with the new Web-tree
> >method... "bells and whistles" galore!
>
> I get dizzy just reading Robert's posts on the subject, but will try
> to understand more of what he's saying by going to his example
place.
>

Robert is extremely patient with everyone... unbelievably so...That
part won't be a problem...

>
> >Conscientious objectors please step forward!
>

> Yeah, it's not too late to object, everyone!

I bet you won't find one single "dissenter..."

Good luck with it John...

>BTW, I'll be out of town all next week, but this is a project
that'll
take much longer than a week to get even into first functional draft
mode, much less polish.
>
> JdL

Well, actually, John... I, personally, see it as a much longer-range
project. No... not meaning more work for you, but more as a
long-range "topic discussion" on the list that will "crystallize"
gradually into a finalized entry. It can grow, gradually, entry by
entry. In fact, THAT part will be the "fun" of it... It can be
something going on in the "background" so to speak...

It will grow page by page, just like the HTML trees themselves! If
we
don't "rush" we can really have something nice, and some great
discussion to boot(up)!

________ _______ _______ _____
Joseph Pehrson