(new MIDI)"Pure hearted beast"

http://www.angelfire.com/mo/oljare/images/purehear.mid

In 17tet,mostly diatonic.This goes for anyone who thinks that the 17tet diatonic scale is to poor to be usable.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-
MATS �LJARE
http://www.angelfire.com/mo/oljare
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Mats wrote,

>http://www.angelfire.com/mo/oljare/images/purehear.mid

>In 17tet,mostly diatonic.This goes for anyone who thinks that the 17tet
>diatonic scale is to poor to be usable.

They should also listen to Blackwood's wonderful 17-tET etude . . .

--- In tuning@y..., "Mats Öljare" <oljare@h...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_18632.html#18632

> http://www.angelfire.com/mo/oljare/images/purehear.mid
>
> In 17tet,mostly diatonic.This goes for anyone who thinks that the
17tet diatonic scale is to poor to be usable.
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-
> MATS ÖLJARE
> http://www.angelfire.com/mo/oljare
>
Thank you for this post... and I really like your writing in this
style... It seems quite natural. This does come out surprisingly
well, given the fact that according to Paul Erlich's chart 17-tET has
virtually NO approximation of low whole number ratios... well, there
is a rather poor representation of th 3-limit, but that's it...
______ ____ ___ _
Joseph Pehrson

Joseph wrote,

>Thank you for this post... and I really like your writing in this
>style... It seems quite natural. This does come out surprisingly
>well, given the fact that according to Paul Erlich's chart 17-tET has
>virtually NO approximation of low whole number ratios... well, there
>is a rather poor representation of th 3-limit, but that's it...

It's a rather _good_ representation of the 3-limit, and that's why Mats'
piece sounds good. He even ends it on a linked 3-limit sonority (a stacked
fourths chord).

--- In tuning@y..., "Paul H. Erlich" <PERLICH@A...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_18632.html#18666

> Joseph wrote,
>
> >Thank you for this post... and I really like your writing in this
> >style... It seems quite natural. This does come out surprisingly
> >well, given the fact that according to Paul Erlich's chart 17-tET
has virtually NO approximation of low whole number ratios... well,
there is a rather poor representation of th 3-limit, but that's it...
>
> It's a rather _good_ representation of the 3-limit, and that's why
Mats'piece sounds good. He even ends it on a linked 3-limit sonority
(a stacked fourths chord).

Whoops.... I was quickly reading the chart wrong... thanks so very
much for your correction! I kept thinking the plots toward the
BOTTOM of the chart were the most accurate! Silly...
________ _____ _____ _
Joseph Pehrson