Xenharmonikon

Daniel Wolf wrote,

>At one point and at my own expense, I sent out sample issues to
>some one hundred University or research libraries. None requested
>subsciptions although XH had already received a number of prominent
>citations.

Why do you suppose the situation was so different with 1/1?

Regarding the eyes of Xnh readers -

What about putting a pdf downloadable on the Xnh site ? That way we can all
either ruin our own eyesight or print it off in glorious 600dpi.

Mark

>What about putting a pdf downloadable on the Xnh site ? That
>way we can all either ruin our own eyesight or print it off in
>glorious 600dpi.

Oh, I suppose you're right. I did just vote in favor of
distributing 1/1 as pdf, after all...

-Carl

--- In tuning@y..., "Mark Gould" <mark.gould@a...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_16522.html#40756

> Regarding the eyes of Xnh readers -
>
> What about putting a pdf downloadable on the Xnh site ? That way we
can all
> either ruin our own eyesight or print it off in glorious 600dpi.
>
> Mark

***Hello Mark...

What is the Xenharmonikon site?? Do you mean "Frog Peak?" That
would be a little unlikely, no, since they are trying to *sell* the
mag??

J. Pehrson

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@rcn.com>

> --- In tuning@y..., "Mark Gould" <mark.gould@a...> wrote:
>
> /tuning/topicId_16522.html#40756
>
> > Regarding the eyes of Xnh readers -
> >
> > What about putting a pdf downloadable on the Xnh site ? That way we
> can all
> > either ruin our own eyesight or print it off in glorious 600dpi.
> >
> > Mark
>
>
> ***Hello Mark...
>
> What is the Xenharmonikon site?? Do you mean "Frog Peak?" That
> would be a little unlikely, no, since they are trying to *sell* the
> mag??

http://xh.xentonic.org/

* David Beardsley
* http://biink.com
* http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley

--- In tuning@y..., David Beardsley <davidbeardsley@b...> wrote:

/tuning/topicId_16522.html#40759

> From: "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@r...>
>
> > --- In tuning@y..., "Mark Gould" <mark.gould@a...> wrote:
> >
> > /tuning/topicId_16522.html#40756
> >
> > > Regarding the eyes of Xnh readers -
> > >
> > > What about putting a pdf downloadable on the Xnh site ? That
way we
> > can all
> > > either ruin our own eyesight or print it off in glorious 600dpi.
> > >
> > > Mark
> >
> >
> > ***Hello Mark...
> >
> > What is the Xenharmonikon site?? Do you mean "Frog Peak?" That
> > would be a little unlikely, no, since they are trying to *sell*
the
> > mag??
>
> http://xh.xentonic.org/
>
>
> * David Beardsley
> * http://biink.com
> * http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley

***Thanks, David. I forgot about this, and it didn't come up in
Google... unless it was way down the line someplace.

JP

In questions like this, make this the first page
to run to!
http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/links.html

Cheers,
Manuel

--- In tuning@y..., manuel.op.de.coul@e... wrote:

> In questions like this, make this the first page
> to run to!
> http://www.xs4all.nl/~huygensf/links.html

Hey, this must be a good page--Manuel put me on it. I'd recommend adding links for Timidity (in the freeware department) and Audio Compositor (under commercial.)

>Hey, this must be a good page--Manuel put me on it.

That is one of the best link pages I've ever seen.

>I'd recommend adding links for Timidity (in the freeware
>department) and Audio Compositor (under commercial.)

Let me ask you about their microtonal support...

?

:)

-Carl

--- In tuning@y..., "Carl Lumma" <clumma@y...> wrote:
> >Hey, this must be a good page--Manuel put me on it.
>
> That is one of the best link pages I've ever seen.
>
> >I'd recommend adding links for Timidity (in the freeware
> >department) and Audio Compositor (under commercial.)
>
> Let me ask you about their microtonal support...

They both have full (14 bit) microtonal support, which is why I mention them.

Gene wrote:
>Hey, this must be a good page--Manuel put me on it.

You already are, in the music section. Could put you
in the composer section too if you like.

>I'd recommend adding links for Timidity (in the freeware department) and
Audio Compositor (under >commercial.)

Good idea.

Manuel

Manuel,

--- In tuning@y..., manuel.op.de.coul@e... wrote:
>
> Gene wrote:
> >Hey, this must be a good page--Manuel put me on it.
>
> You already are, in the music section. Could put you
> in the composer section too if you like.

I think something got lost in the translation, and Gene wasn't asking to be included. I think what *I* inferred was:

"Manuel (has already) put me on it."

Gene can correct me if I'm wrong. And I'd second the suggestion for GWS to be in the composer section.

Cheers,
Jon

--- In tuning@y..., manuel.op.de.coul@e... wrote:
>
> Gene wrote:
> >Hey, this must be a good page--Manuel put me on it.
>
> You already are, in the music section. Could put you
> in the composer section too if you like.

I'd be honored.

>>>I'd recommend adding links for Timidity (in the freeware
>>>department) and Audio Compositor (under commercial.)
>>
>>Let me ask you about their microtonal support...
>
>They both have full (14 bit) microtonal support, which is why
>I mention them.

You mean they keep all the bits of a pitch bend? They are
still limited to 128 notes/channel, I assume... can you freely
map notes to frequencies without pitch bend?

-Carl

--- In tuning@y..., "Carl Lumma" <clumma@y...> wrote:

> You mean they keep all the bits of a pitch bend? They are
> still limited to 128 notes/channel, I assume...

'fraid so. AC does allow you to add tracks to an existing wav file, though.

can you freely
> map notes to frequencies without pitch bend?

Ac is testing out implimeting the midi tuning standard:

http://home.att.net/~audiocompositor/actuning.htm