New Yorker article on Saddam Hussein

Read it??

jp

http://www.newyorker.com/online/content/?020325on_onlineonly01

----- Original Message -----
From: "jpehrson2" <jpehrson@...>

> Read it??

I'll check it out.

* David Beardsley
* http://biink.com
* http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley

----- Original Message -----
From: "jpehrson2" <jpehrson@...>
To: <metatuning@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:51 PM
Subject: [metatuning] New Yorker article on Saddam Hussein

> Read it??

So I read the article (is this the same article you're
refering to?). What a mess. Bush the First should have
finished what he started.

* David Beardsley
* http://biink.com
* http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley

In a message dated 3/21/02 2:54:55 AM Eastern Standard Time, db@...
writes:

> So I read the article (is this the same article you're
> refering to?). What a mess.

No Dave, the article is over 5 pages long. This is a post-article huddle for
people who are curious...and then go out and by The New Yorker issue itself.

Bush the First should have
> finished what he started.
>
I totally agree with you and have felt strongly about this since Bush I
surreptitiously place American soldiers in the Saudi desert.

On another matter: why do people have heart attacks at earlier ages, wouldn't
this personal question be answered simply "by a weak heart"?

Best, Johnny Reinhard

>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In metatuning@y..., David Beardsley <db@b...> wrote:

/metatuning/topicId_2095.html#2099

>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "jpehrson2" <jpehrson@r...>
> To: <metatuning@y...>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:51 PM
> Subject: [metatuning] New Yorker article on Saddam Hussein
>
>
> > Read it??
>
> So I read the article (is this the same article you're
> refering to?). What a mess. Bush the First should have
> finished what he started.
>
>
> * David Beardsley
> * http://biink.com
> * http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley

***Hi David

Yes, the article is the lengthy one on Saddam Hussein in the current
issue. It takes up *most* of the magazine...

best,

jp

On 3/21/02 10:23 AM, "Afmmjr@..." <Afmmjr@...> wrote:

> why do people have heart attacks at earlier ages, wouldn't
> this personal question be answered simply "by a weak heart"?

Are you suggesting that's how I answer it?