Re: [MMM] larger corpus?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@...>

> ***Hi David!
>
> Well, it's kind of tricky stuff... for what *you're* doing,
> obviously, the "purity" of the JI is part of the gig. Anything
> outside of that is *never* going to sound "good..." It's not in the
> esthetic, obviously... I imagine Catler is a bit like this, too,
> although I *believe* he's used 12-equal in some of his ensemble
> pieces for the other players besides his solo guitar... (Dunno, but
> I *think* I'm right on that...)

I think he's been totally JI for more then 10 years. Before that
he worked in 19 & 31 tet, but that was long before I knew anything
about his music. All of his albums are JI except for Cow People.
Evolution is all JI.

> My *own* style, however, is considerably more eclectic,

In what way?

>so I'm trying
> to shove all the great stuff I've learned from *you* guys into
> my "larger corpus..."
>
> (That's a rather painful process... :)

* David Beardsley
* http://biink.com
* http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley

--- In MakeMicroMusic@y..., "David Beardsley" <davidbeardsley@b...>

/makemicromusic/topicId_3958.html#3958

>
>
> > My *own* style, however, is considerably more eclectic,
>
> In what way?
>

***Hi David...

I don't work exclusively in JI...

JP

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joseph Pehrson" <jpehrson@...>

> --- In MakeMicroMusic@y..., "David Beardsley" <davidbeardsley@b...>
>
> /makemicromusic/topicId_3958.html#3958
>
> >
> >
> > > My *own* style, however, is considerably more eclectic,
> >
> > In what way?
> >
>
> ***Hi David...
>
> I don't work exclusively in JI...

OK. I understand now.

* David Beardsley
* http://biink.com
* http://mp3.com/davidbeardsley