back to list

Re: [MMM] Re: Monzo: _Etude in F#_ for piano (1985)

🔗monz <joemonz@...>

3/12/2002 3:49:05 PM

thanks for your comments, Joe.

yes, the tuning JdL arrived at here is kind of weird,
but hey, it's microtonal ... and SOUNDS microtonal!

JdL actually did a few "stretch" versions which i
liked better better on some pieces and less on others
... i'll get around to making mp3s of this piece in
stretched adaptive-JI too.

... and, for completeness, i suppose i should make
one in 12edo as well.

-monz

----- Original Message -----
From: jpehrson2 <jpehrson@...>
To: <MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 6:20 PM
Subject: [MMM] Re: Monzo: _Etude in F#_ for piano (1985)

> --- In MakeMicroMusic@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
>
> /makemicromusic/topicId_2593.html#2593
>
> >
> > mp3 of John deLaubenfels's "adaptune"
> > 7-limit adaptive-JI retuning of my MIDI sequence
> >
> > Monzo: _Etude in F#_ for piano (1985)
> > http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/worklist/etudefsz7.mp3
> >
> >
> >
> > -monz
>
> ***Hi Monz.
>
> Well, this is nice, with echoes of both minimalism and, I hear,
> Stravinsky.
>
> However, personally, I find the tuning "weird."
>
> I think the "problem" is the association with the piano sound. I'm
> *so* used to hearing 12-tET in piano or *at least* "well
> temperaments" that it's hard for me to accept the Just in this
> particular kind of style...
>
> Probably my *own* problem...
>
> Thanks for posting!
>
> jp
>
>
>
>
> [MMM info]-------------------------------------------------------
> More music files from MMM are at http://www.microtonal.org/music/
> -------------------------------------------------------[MMM info]
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @... address at http://mail.yahoo.com

🔗jpehrson2 <jpehrson@...>

3/12/2002 8:22:39 PM

--- In MakeMicroMusic@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:

/makemicromusic/topicId_2599.html#2599

> thanks for your comments, Joe.
>
> yes, the tuning JdL arrived at here is kind of weird,
> but hey, it's microtonal ... and SOUNDS microtonal!
>

***Why, of course, Monz, but, on the other hand, the tuning has to
fit with the *style* and I wasn't totally convinced in this case...

> JdL actually did a few "stretch" versions which i
> liked better better on some pieces and less on others
> ... i'll get around to making mp3s of this piece in
> stretched adaptive-JI too.
>
> ... and, for completeness, i suppose i should make
> one in 12edo as well.
>

***I think I'd like that better, despite the fact...

jp