back to list

Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book

🔗mark c <ahsom@rockisland.com>

4/20/2000 10:18:40 PM

Mark C. Billington here. I don't understand this new group I just entered,
and I don't understand your response, but I do know I've worked 18 years to
present my case and until anybody views my evidence, their prejudices will
only be that to me. I respect well thought out criticism.
Time unfolds many things

-----Original Message-----
From: Jay Williams <jaywill@utah-inter.net>
To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
Date: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:21 PM
Subject: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book

>Jay here,
>Well yah, I trashed that blurb but then, contrary to John Link's sage
>counsel, plowed through some of that attached file. Kinda brings to mind a
>type of call we'd often get at the company I worked for. We were in the
>business of designing and constructing adaptive aids for blind folks using,
>whenever possible, off-the-shelf stuff so the stuff could be duplicated
>without aid of manufacturies.
>This guy calls us up and says he's designed a reading system for the blind
>that's a whole lot easier than Braille cuz it uses only eight dots. We
asked
>him how his system would be easier since Braille used only six dots. He
said
>we were wrong, Braille used 12 dots. We informed him that the three of us
>tekkies in the lab all read Braille and except for the 8-dot format used
>when control characters had to be indicated, we could only count six dots
in
>a Braille cell. This went on for some time, the only conclusion was that
>each side accused the other of not doing his homework.
>Not quite sure why that post brought that to my tilted brain, but it did.
>Then again...
>But while I'm here I'll say my temporary farewell. We're moving to Port
>Angeles, Washington in a week so I'll hafta suffer withdrawal for a week or
>three.
>Glad I found this list. It's great to be conversing with a buncha bright
>people. Thanks so much for all the info so far and the sheer liveliness of
>the exchanges.
>I'll still be around til probably Wednesday.
>Okay, end of frivolity. Back to serious stuff.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
>Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
>registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
>http://click.egroups.com/1/2886/1/_/239029/_/956287287/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
mode.
> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
emails.
>
>

🔗ppagano@bellsouth.net

4/21/2000 6:49:44 AM

Mark,
Your predjudices are bleeding through a bit to me. You've worked 18 years on what? figuring out
what members of this list already know? I am not following what you are after except an
eventual market for your book. Not that that is bad but please don't assume that we need to be
instructed.
This list i thought was for sharing ideas, and what you have chosen to show is basic knowledge~
you are not in a vacuum
18 years = better does not work for me
i need feelings to evoke respect n
i need something more from you...
Pagano

mark c wrote:

> Mark C. Billington here. I don't understand this new group I just entered,
> and I don't understand your response, but I do know I've worked 18 years to
> present my case and until anybody views my evidence, their prejudices will
> only be that to me. I respect well thought out criticism.
> Time unfolds many things
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jay Williams <jaywill@utah-inter.net>
> To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
> Date: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:21 PM
> Subject: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
>
> >Jay here,
> >Well yah, I trashed that blurb but then, contrary to John Link's sage
> >counsel, plowed through some of that attached file. Kinda brings to mind a
> >type of call we'd often get at the company I worked for. We were in the
> >business of designing and constructing adaptive aids for blind folks using,
> >whenever possible, off-the-shelf stuff so the stuff could be duplicated
> >without aid of manufacturies.
> >This guy calls us up and says he's designed a reading system for the blind
> >that's a whole lot easier than Braille cuz it uses only eight dots. We
> asked
> >him how his system would be easier since Braille used only six dots. He
> said
> >we were wrong, Braille used 12 dots. We informed him that the three of us
> >tekkies in the lab all read Braille and except for the 8-dot format used
> >when control characters had to be indicated, we could only count six dots
> in
> >a Braille cell. This went on for some time, the only conclusion was that
> >each side accused the other of not doing his homework.
> >Not quite sure why that post brought that to my tilted brain, but it did.
> >Then again...
> >But while I'm here I'll say my temporary farewell. We're moving to Port
> >Angeles, Washington in a week so I'll hafta suffer withdrawal for a week or
> >three.
> >Glad I found this list. It's great to be conversing with a buncha bright
> >people. Thanks so much for all the info so far and the sheer liveliness of
> >the exchanges.
> >I'll still be around til probably Wednesday.
> >Okay, end of frivolity. Back to serious stuff.
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
> >Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
> >registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/2886/1/_/239029/_/956287287/
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> >email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> > tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> > tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> > tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
> the tuning group.
> > tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
> mode.
> > tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
> emails.
> >
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Enjoy the award-winning journalism of The New York Times with
> convenient home delivery. And for a limited time, get 50% off for the
> first 8 weeks by subscribing. Pay by credit card and receive an
> additional 4 weeks at this low introductory rate.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3102/1/_/239029/_/956294319/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest mode.
> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual emails.

🔗mark c <ahsom@rockisland.com>

4/21/2000 10:37:01 AM

I am somewhat of a fanatic, though I work on making available and not
imposing. Since I perceive harmony in everything except society made music
(including just tuning) I guess I am on a crusade. I'm sorry if you already
know all this and I have imposed my identical beliefs. Thus I assume you
enjoy your harmonic instruments.

-----Original Message-----
From: ppagano@bellsouth.net <ppagano@bellsouth.net>
To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
Date: Friday, April 21, 2000 6:49 AM
Subject: Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book

>Mark,
>Your predjudices are bleeding through a bit to me. You've worked 18 years
on what? figuring out
>what members of this list already know? I am not following what you are
after except an
>eventual market for your book. Not that that is bad but please don't assume
that we need to be
>instructed.
>This list i thought was for sharing ideas, and what you have chosen to show
is basic knowledge~
>you are not in a vacuum
>18 years = better does not work for me
>i need feelings to evoke respect n
>i need something more from you...
>Pagano
>
>mark c wrote:
>
>> Mark C. Billington here. I don't understand this new group I just
entered,
>> and I don't understand your response, but I do know I've worked 18 years
to
>> present my case and until anybody views my evidence, their prejudices
will
>> only be that to me. I respect well thought out criticism.
>> Time unfolds many things
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jay Williams <jaywill@utah-inter.net>
>> To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
>> Date: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:21 PM
>> Subject: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
>>
>> >Jay here,
>> >Well yah, I trashed that blurb but then, contrary to John Link's sage
>> >counsel, plowed through some of that attached file. Kinda brings to mind
a
>> >type of call we'd often get at the company I worked for. We were in the
>> >business of designing and constructing adaptive aids for blind folks
using,
>> >whenever possible, off-the-shelf stuff so the stuff could be duplicated
>> >without aid of manufacturies.
>> >This guy calls us up and says he's designed a reading system for the
blind
>> >that's a whole lot easier than Braille cuz it uses only eight dots. We
>> asked
>> >him how his system would be easier since Braille used only six dots. He
>> said
>> >we were wrong, Braille used 12 dots. We informed him that the three of
us
>> >tekkies in the lab all read Braille and except for the 8-dot format used
>> >when control characters had to be indicated, we could only count six
dots
>> in
>> >a Braille cell. This went on for some time, the only conclusion was that
>> >each side accused the other of not doing his homework.
>> >Not quite sure why that post brought that to my tilted brain, but it
did.
>> >Then again...
>> >But while I'm here I'll say my temporary farewell. We're moving to Port
>> >Angeles, Washington in a week so I'll hafta suffer withdrawal for a week
or
>> >three.
>> >Glad I found this list. It's great to be conversing with a buncha bright
>> >people. Thanks so much for all the info so far and the sheer liveliness
of
>> >the exchanges.
>> >I'll still be around til probably Wednesday.
>> >Okay, end of frivolity. Back to serious stuff.
>> >
>> >
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
>> >Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
>> >registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
>> >http://click.egroups.com/1/2886/1/_/239029/_/956287287/
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>> >email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
>> > tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
>> > tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
>> > tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold
for
>> the tuning group.
>> > tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
>> mode.
>> > tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
>> emails.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Enjoy the award-winning journalism of The New York Times with
>> convenient home delivery. And for a limited time, get 50% off for the
>> first 8 weeks by subscribing. Pay by credit card and receive an
>> additional 4 weeks at this low introductory rate.
>> http://click.egroups.com/1/3102/1/_/239029/_/956294319/
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
>> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
>> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
>> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
the tuning group.
>> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
mode.
>> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
emails.
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Win $1000 at eGroups!
>Enter "$1000 Fridays" at:
>http://click.egroups.com/1/2862/1/_/239029/_/956324996/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
mode.
> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
emails.
>
>

🔗Rosati <dante@pop.interport.net>

4/21/2000 10:48:45 AM

Mark-

Every possible just interval can be described using the harmonic series: 5/4
is the interval between the fifth and fourth harmonic, etc. If you play
music limited to harmonics of the fundamental, you are mearly using a subset
of possible just intervals: 1/1,2/1,3/1,4/1,5/1, etc.

So, do you have any web-available mp3s or RA files of this "one true music"
you play? Sounds speak louder than words.

Dante

----- Original Message -----
From: mark c <ahsom@rockisland.com>
To: <tuning@egroups.com>
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book

> I am somewhat of a fanatic, though I work on making available and not
> imposing. Since I perceive harmony in everything except society made music
> (including just tuning) I guess I am on a crusade. I'm sorry if you
already
> know all this and I have imposed my identical beliefs. Thus I assume you
> enjoy your harmonic instruments.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ppagano@bellsouth.net <ppagano@bellsouth.net>
> To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
> Date: Friday, April 21, 2000 6:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
>
>
> >Mark,
> >Your predjudices are bleeding through a bit to me. You've worked 18 years
> on what? figuring out
> >what members of this list already know? I am not following what you are
> after except an
> >eventual market for your book. Not that that is bad but please don't
assume
> that we need to be
> >instructed.
> >This list i thought was for sharing ideas, and what you have chosen to
show
> is basic knowledge~
> >you are not in a vacuum
> >18 years = better does not work for me
> >i need feelings to evoke respect n
> >i need something more from you...
> >Pagano
> >
> >mark c wrote:
> >
> >> Mark C. Billington here. I don't understand this new group I just
> entered,
> >> and I don't understand your response, but I do know I've worked 18
years
> to
> >> present my case and until anybody views my evidence, their prejudices
> will
> >> only be that to me. I respect well thought out criticism.
> >> Time unfolds many things
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jay Williams <jaywill@utah-inter.net>
> >> To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
> >> Date: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:21 PM
> >> Subject: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
> >>
> >> >Jay here,
> >> >Well yah, I trashed that blurb but then, contrary to John Link's sage
> >> >counsel, plowed through some of that attached file. Kinda brings to
mind
> a
> >> >type of call we'd often get at the company I worked for. We were in
the
> >> >business of designing and constructing adaptive aids for blind folks
> using,
> >> >whenever possible, off-the-shelf stuff so the stuff could be
duplicated
> >> >without aid of manufacturies.
> >> >This guy calls us up and says he's designed a reading system for the
> blind
> >> >that's a whole lot easier than Braille cuz it uses only eight dots. We
> >> asked
> >> >him how his system would be easier since Braille used only six dots.
He
> >> said
> >> >we were wrong, Braille used 12 dots. We informed him that the three of
> us
> >> >tekkies in the lab all read Braille and except for the 8-dot format
used
> >> >when control characters had to be indicated, we could only count six
> dots
> >> in
> >> >a Braille cell. This went on for some time, the only conclusion was
that
> >> >each side accused the other of not doing his homework.
> >> >Not quite sure why that post brought that to my tilted brain, but it
> did.
> >> >Then again...
> >> >But while I'm here I'll say my temporary farewell. We're moving to
Port
> >> >Angeles, Washington in a week so I'll hafta suffer withdrawal for a
week
> or
> >> >three.
> >> >Glad I found this list. It's great to be conversing with a buncha
bright
> >> >people. Thanks so much for all the info so far and the sheer
liveliness
> of
> >> >the exchanges.
> >> >I'll still be around til probably Wednesday.
> >> >Okay, end of frivolity. Back to serious stuff.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
> >> >Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
> >> >registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
> >> >http://click.egroups.com/1/2886/1/_/239029/_/956287287/
> >>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> >> >email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> >> > tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> >> > tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> >> > tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold
> for
> >> the tuning group.
> >> > tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
> >> mode.
> >> > tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
> >> emails.
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Enjoy the award-winning journalism of The New York Times with
> >> convenient home delivery. And for a limited time, get 50% off for the
> >> first 8 weeks by subscribing. Pay by credit card and receive an
> >> additional 4 weeks at this low introductory rate.
> >> http://click.egroups.com/1/3102/1/_/239029/_/956294319/
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> >> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> >> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> >> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> >> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold
for
> the tuning group.
> >> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
> mode.
> >> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
> emails.
> >
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Win $1000 at eGroups!
> >Enter "$1000 Fridays" at:
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/2862/1/_/239029/_/956324996/
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> >email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> > tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> > tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> > tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
> the tuning group.
> > tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
> mode.
> > tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
> emails.
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
> you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3012/1/_/239029/_/956338622/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
mode.
> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
emails.
>
>
>

🔗mark c <ahsom@rockisland.com>

4/21/2000 12:46:54 PM

True, the proof is in the pudding and time for proper recording is not
yet.mcb (still waiting)

-----Original Message-----
From: Rosati <dante@pop.interport.net>
To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
Date: Friday, April 21, 2000 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book

>Mark-
>
>Every possible just interval can be described using the harmonic series:
5/4
>is the interval between the fifth and fourth harmonic, etc. If you play
>music limited to harmonics of the fundamental, you are mearly using a
subset
>of possible just intervals: 1/1,2/1,3/1,4/1,5/1, etc.
>
>So, do you have any web-available mp3s or RA files of this "one true music"
>you play? Sounds speak louder than words.
>
>Dante
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: mark c <ahsom@rockisland.com>
>To: <tuning@egroups.com>
>Sent: Friday, April 21, 2000 1:37 PM
>Subject: Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
>
>
>> I am somewhat of a fanatic, though I work on making available and not
>> imposing. Since I perceive harmony in everything except society made
music
>> (including just tuning) I guess I am on a crusade. I'm sorry if you
>already
>> know all this and I have imposed my identical beliefs. Thus I assume you
>> enjoy your harmonic instruments.
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ppagano@bellsouth.net <ppagano@bellsouth.net>
>> To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
>> Date: Friday, April 21, 2000 6:49 AM
>> Subject: Re: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
>>
>>
>> >Mark,
>> >Your predjudices are bleeding through a bit to me. You've worked 18
years
>> on what? figuring out
>> >what members of this list already know? I am not following what you are
>> after except an
>> >eventual market for your book. Not that that is bad but please don't
>assume
>> that we need to be
>> >instructed.
>> >This list i thought was for sharing ideas, and what you have chosen to
>show
>> is basic knowledge~
>> >you are not in a vacuum
>> >18 years = better does not work for me
>> >i need feelings to evoke respect n
>> >i need something more from you...
>> >Pagano
>> >
>> >mark c wrote:
>> >
>> >> Mark C. Billington here. I don't understand this new group I just
>> entered,
>> >> and I don't understand your response, but I do know I've worked 18
>years
>> to
>> >> present my case and until anybody views my evidence, their prejudices
>> will
>> >> only be that to me. I respect well thought out criticism.
>> >> Time unfolds many things
>> >>
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: Jay Williams <jaywill@utah-inter.net>
>> >> To: tuning@egroups.com <tuning@egroups.com>
>> >> Date: Thursday, April 20, 2000 8:21 PM
>> >> Subject: [tuning] re: that 16-note-per-octave harmonic system book
>> >>
>> >> >Jay here,
>> >> >Well yah, I trashed that blurb but then, contrary to John Link's sage
>> >> >counsel, plowed through some of that attached file. Kinda brings to
>mind
>> a
>> >> >type of call we'd often get at the company I worked for. We were in
>the
>> >> >business of designing and constructing adaptive aids for blind folks
>> using,
>> >> >whenever possible, off-the-shelf stuff so the stuff could be
>duplicated
>> >> >without aid of manufacturies.
>> >> >This guy calls us up and says he's designed a reading system for the
>> blind
>> >> >that's a whole lot easier than Braille cuz it uses only eight dots.
We
>> >> asked
>> >> >him how his system would be easier since Braille used only six dots.
>He
>> >> said
>> >> >we were wrong, Braille used 12 dots. We informed him that the three
of
>> us
>> >> >tekkies in the lab all read Braille and except for the 8-dot format
>used
>> >> >when control characters had to be indicated, we could only count six
>> dots
>> >> in
>> >> >a Braille cell. This went on for some time, the only conclusion was
>that
>> >> >each side accused the other of not doing his homework.
>> >> >Not quite sure why that post brought that to my tilted brain, but it
>> did.
>> >> >Then again...
>> >> >But while I'm here I'll say my temporary farewell. We're moving to
>Port
>> >> >Angeles, Washington in a week so I'll hafta suffer withdrawal for a
>week
>> or
>> >> >three.
>> >> >Glad I found this list. It's great to be conversing with a buncha
>bright
>> >> >people. Thanks so much for all the info so far and the sheer
>liveliness
>> of
>> >> >the exchanges.
>> >> >I'll still be around til probably Wednesday.
>> >> >Okay, end of frivolity. Back to serious stuff.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >Good friends, school spirit, hair-dos you'd like to forget.
>> >> >Classmates.com has them all. And with 4.4 million alumni already
>> >> >registered, there's a good chance you'll find your friends here:
>> >> >http://click.egroups.com/1/2886/1/_/239029/_/956287287/
>> >>
>>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >
>> >> >You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>> >> >email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
>> >> > tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
>> >> > tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
>> >> > tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold
>> for
>> >> the tuning group.
>> >> > tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily
digest
>> >> mode.
>> >> > tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
>> >> emails.
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> Enjoy the award-winning journalism of The New York Times with
>> >> convenient home delivery. And for a limited time, get 50% off for the
>> >> first 8 weeks by subscribing. Pay by credit card and receive an
>> >> additional 4 weeks at this low introductory rate.
>> >> http://click.egroups.com/1/3102/1/_/239029/_/956294319/
>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >>
>> >> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>> >> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
>> >> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
>> >> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
>> >> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold
>for
>> the tuning group.
>> >> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
>> mode.
>> >> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
>> emails.
>> >
>> >
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >Win $1000 at eGroups!
>> >Enter "$1000 Fridays" at:
>> >http://click.egroups.com/1/2862/1/_/239029/_/956324996/
>> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> >You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>> >email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
>> > tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
>> > tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
>> > tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold
for
>> the tuning group.
>> > tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
>> mode.
>> > tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
>> emails.
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Get your money connected @ OnMoney.com - the first Web site that lets
>> you see and manage all of your finances all in one place.
>> http://click.egroups.com/1/3012/1/_/239029/_/956338622/
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>> email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
>> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
>> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
>> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
>the tuning group.
>> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
>mode.
>> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
>emails.
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Win $1000 this Friday!
>http://click.egroups.com/1/2860/1/_/239029/_/956339270/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>You do not need web access to participate. You may subscribe through
>email. Send an empty email to one of these addresses:
> tuning-subscribe@egroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@egroups.com - unsubscribe from the tuning group.
> tuning-nomail@egroups.com - put your email message delivery on hold for
the tuning group.
> tuning-digest@egroups.com - change your subscription to daily digest
mode.
> tuning-normal@egroups.com - change your subscription to individual
emails.
>
>