back to list

Re: [tuning] 6:7:9

🔗D.Stearns <STEARNS@CAPECOD.NET>

3/31/2000 9:54:12 PM

Paul H. Erlich wrote,

> Or are you actually referring to its mirror image, 1/(6:7:9) or
14:18:21?

Shouldn't that be a 1/(9:7:6)?