back to list

RE: [tuning] 6:7:9

3/30/2000 5:49:39 PM

Hear it at http://lumma.org/erlich/wav/; click on minor0.wav (other minor
triads are there for comparison . . .)

3/31/2000 4:45:05 AM

>From: Gary Morrison <MR88CET@TEXAS.NET>
>Sent: Friday, March 31, 2000 8:22 AM
>Subject: [tuning] 6:7:9
>

> Now it's inversion on the other hand, has a much more freaky-sounding
sensation
> to my ears. Of course all of this depends upon timbre.
>

Do you mean the exact inversion (/6:/7:/9) or the voicing "inversions" or
"positions": 7:9:12, 9:12:14 ?

3/31/2000 1:27:59 PM

Gary Morrison wrote,

>Now it's inversion on the other hand, has a much more freaky-sounding
sensation
>to my ears. Of course all of this depends upon timbre.

Do you mean its first inversion (7:9:12) or its second inversion (9:12:14)?
Or are you actually referring to its mirror image, 1/(6:7:9) or 14:18:21?