My first book (in Turkish alas)

Dear members, take note please!

My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in print.

This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the
maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and
comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.

Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and
Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam
music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the
Analytical section.

Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor
who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive
beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse
language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,
third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-
tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music
in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.

I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I would
like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.

Cordially,
Dr. Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

Congratulations, Ozan.  When is the English version coming out?
best
Franklin

Dr. Franklin Cox

1107 Xenia Ave.

Yellow Springs, OH 45387

(937) 767-1165

franklincox@...

--- On Wed, 4/28/10, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:

From: Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...>
Subject: [tuning] My first book (in Turkish alas)
To: "Tuning List" <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
Cc: MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 11:29 PM

Dear members, take note please!

My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch

Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in print.

This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the

maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and

comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.

Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and

Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam

music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the

Analytical section.

Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor

who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive

beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse

language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,

third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-

tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music

in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.

I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I would

like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.

Cordially,

Dr. Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩

www.ozanyarman. com

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
> Dear members, take note please!
>
> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in print.

In honor of the occasion, I present the following circulating temperament:

! ozancirc.scl
Circulating temperament in Ozan Yarman's 159-equal tuning
12
!
98.113207547169811321
196.22641509433962264
316.98113207547169811
384.90566037735849057
505.66037735849056604
588.67924528301886793
694.33962264150943396
807.54716981132075472
890.56603773584905661
1011.3207547169811321
1079.2452830188679245
1200.0000000000000000

This is pretty ruthless, I'm afraid, with a 9/7 major third and another sharp of 14/11. Probably George could do better; it could certainly be done differently as there are a lot of ways to cook something like this up. Anyway, y'all can have fun making Mozart's Turkish music into Turkish music by retuning it.

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@> wrote:

using
http://superspace.epfl.ch/approximator/
yields

> ! ozancirc.scl
> Circulating temperament in Ozan Yarman's 159-equal tuning
> 12
> !
18/17 ! C# > 98.113207547169811321
28/25 ! D_ > 196.22641509433962264
6/5 ! Eb__ > 316.98113207547169811
5/4 ! E___ > 384.90566037735849057
4/3 ! F___ > 505.66037735849056604 or closer 75/56 ?
7/5 ! F#__ > 588.67924528301886793 or closer 52/37 ?
112/75 ! G > 694.33962264150943396 or coarser 3/2 ?
51/32 ! G# > 807.54716981132075472
92/55 ! A_ > 890.56603773584905661 or coarser 5/3 ?
52/29 ! Bb > 1011.3207547169811321 or coarser 9/5 ?
13/7! B___ > 1079.2452830188679245 or closer 69/37 ?
2/1 ! c___ > 1200.0000000000000000
!

Are those more understandable ratios correct?

Bye
A.S.

Thanks Franklin! Now that you mention it, I should put an English
translation on my agenda.

Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On Apr 29, 2010, at 2:48 AM, Cox Franklin wrote:

>
>
> Congratulations, Ozan. When is the English version coming out?
>
> best
>
> Franklin
>
> Dr. Franklin Cox
> 1107 Xenia Ave.
> Yellow Springs, OH 45387
> (937) 767-1165
> franklincox@...
>
> --- On Wed, 4/28/10, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@ozanyarman.com> wrote:
>
> From: Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...>
> Subject: [tuning] My first book (in Turkish alas)
> To: "Tuning List" <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
> Cc: MakeMicroMusic@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 11:29 PM
>
> Dear members, take note please!
>
> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in
> print.
>
> This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the
> maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and
> comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.
>
> Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and
> Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam
> music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the
> Analytical section.
>
> Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor
> who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive
> beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse
> language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,
> third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-
> tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music
> in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.
>
> I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I would
> like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.
>
> Cordially,
> Dr. Oz.
>
> ✩ ✩ ✩
> www.ozanyarman. com
>
>

Nice. But too many super-pyth fifths there. Besides, 159-equal is not
my invention. My contribution is finding the 79-tone subset that
happens to be a MOS suitable for maqamat.

How about this one?

12-tone 79 MOS 159ET splendid beating
|
0: 1/1 0.000 unison, perfect prime
1: 91.689 cents 91.689
2: 196.552 cents 196.552
3: 302.375 cents 302.375
4: 392.909 cents 392.909
5: 4/3 498.045 perfect fourth
6: 589.342 cents 589.342
7: 3/2 701.955 perfect fifth
8: 792.077 cents 792.077
9: 897.524 cents 897.524
10: 1003.508 cents 1003.508
11: 1093.547 cents 1093.547
12: 2/1 1200.000 octave

Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:13 AM, genewardsmith wrote:

>
>
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>>
>> Dear members, take note please!
>>
>> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
>> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in
>> print.
>
> In honor of the occasion, I present the following circulating
> temperament:
>
> ! ozancirc.scl
> Circulating temperament in Ozan Yarman's 159-equal tuning
> 12
> !
> 98.113207547169811321
> 196.22641509433962264
> 316.98113207547169811
> 384.90566037735849057
> 505.66037735849056604
> 588.67924528301886793
> 694.33962264150943396
> 807.54716981132075472
> 890.56603773584905661
> 1011.3207547169811321
> 1079.2452830188679245
> 1200.0000000000000000
>
> This is pretty ruthless, I'm afraid, with a 9/7 major third and
> another sharp of 14/11. Probably George could do better; it could
> certainly be done differently as there are a lot of ways to cook
> something like this up. Anyway, y'all can have fun making Mozart's
> Turkish music into Turkish music by retuning it.
>

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
> Nice. But too many super-pyth fifths there. Besides, 159-equal is not
> my invention. My contribution is finding the 79-tone subset that
> happens to be a MOS suitable for maqamat.
>
> How about this one?

Pretty good, but of course identical to what you gave a few years ago when you were working this stuff out.

And though you cannot read Turkish, one can still appreciate the cover
page design here:

http://www.ozanyarman.com/misc/sesdunyamizdakapak.jpg

Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:04 AM, Carl Lumma wrote:

> Congratulations, Ozan. If only I read Turkish. -Carl
>
> At 04:29 PM 4/28/2010, you wrote:
>>
>> Dear members, take note please!
>>
>> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
>> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in
>> print.
>>
>> This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the
>> maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and
>> comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.
>>
>> Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and
>> Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam
>> music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the
>> Analytical section.
>>
>> Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor
>> who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive
>> beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse
>> language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,
>> third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-
>> tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music
>> in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.
>>
>> I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I
>> would
>> like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.
>>
>> Cordially,
>> Dr. Oz.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

That is a cool cover!

And thanks for the explanation on the beating. Sound like a confused
perception. But perhaps that professor has ringing in his ears and
notes beat against that. It may sound silly but actually that happens
to my wife.

Chris

On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:47 AM, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
>
>
> And though you cannot read Turkish, one can still appreciate the cover page design here:
> http://www.ozanyarman.com/misc/sesdunyamizdakapak.jpg
> Oz.
>
> ✩ ✩ ✩
> www.ozanyarman.com
> On Apr 29, 2010, at 3:04 AM, Carl Lumma wrote:
>

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote/asked:
> How about this one?
> 12-tone 79 MOS 159ET splendid beating
> |
> 0: 1/1 0.000 unison, perfect prime
> 1: 91.689 cents 91.689
> 2: 196.552 cents 196.552
> 3: 302.375 cents 302.375
> 4: 392.909 cents 392.909
> 5: 4/3 498.045 perfect fourth
> 6: 589.342 cents 589.342
> 7: 3/2 701.955 perfect fifth
> 8: 792.077 cents 792.077
> 9: 897.524 cents 897.524
> 10: 1003.508 cents 1003.508
> 11: 1093.547 cents 1093.547
> 12: 2/1 1200.000 octave
>
There are also some rational approximations near to yours Cent-values:

C 0: 1/1
# 1: 2^(91.689/1200) = ~1.054389... > (19/18) ~91.1386239...C
D 2: 2^(196.552/1200) = ~1.120228... > (28/25) ~196.198479...C
# 3: 2^(302.375/1200) = ~1.190839... > (25/21) ~301.846520...C
E 4: 2^(392.909/1200) = ~1.254771... > (64/51) ~393.089593...C
F 5: 4/3
# 6: 2^(589.342/1200) = ~1.405533... < (45/32) ~590.22371...C
G 7: 3/2
# 8: 2^(792.077/1200) = ~1.580152... < (128/81) ~792.17999...C
A 9: 2^(897.524/1200) = ~1.679389... < (42/25) ~898.15348...C
# 10: 2^(1003.508/1200) = ~1.785411... > (25/14) ~1003.8015...C
B 11: 2^(1093.547/1200) = ~1.880725... > (47/25) ~1092.8791...C
c 12: 2/1

Attend:
Each pitch deviates less than only 1 Cent depart from the original.

That Approximation yields in terms of the 'scala' file format:

!OzYarmanApprox.scl
Ozan Yarman's 79-MOS-159ET splendid-beating rat. approx. by Sparschuh
!compiled within precision accuracy of less than 1 Cent deviation
!
12
!
19/18
28/25
25/21
64/51
4/3
45/32
3/2
128/81
42/25
25/14
47/25
2/1
!
![eof]

Conclusion:
Hence yours choices near to that reasonable ratios sounds well apt
at least in my ears.

bye
A.S.

All of these ratios - save 19/18 and 47/25 - appear in my doctorate
dissertation (pp. 95-6) as viable approximations to the 79 MOS 2 deg
159-EDO degrees, Andreas. :)

But, you have miscalculated the cents for 19/18. It should have been
93.60301440152743 cents, not 91.1386239.

I would suggest, instead of the absent ratios above, 135/128 and
32/17. Any simpler ratio for the limma tends to fall away from the
intended 91.7 cents.

Cordially,
Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On Apr 30, 2010, at 5:39 PM, a_sparschuh wrote:

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote/
> asked:
>> How about this one?
>> 12-tone 79 MOS 159ET splendid beating
>> |
>> 0: 1/1 0.000 unison, perfect prime
>> 1: 91.689 cents 91.689
>> 2: 196.552 cents 196.552
>> 3: 302.375 cents 302.375
>> 4: 392.909 cents 392.909
>> 5: 4/3 498.045 perfect fourth
>> 6: 589.342 cents 589.342
>> 7: 3/2 701.955 perfect fifth
>> 8: 792.077 cents 792.077
>> 9: 897.524 cents 897.524
>> 10: 1003.508 cents 1003.508
>> 11: 1093.547 cents 1093.547
>> 12: 2/1 1200.000 octave
>>
> There are also some rational approximations near to yours Cent-values:
>
> C 0: 1/1
> # 1: 2^(91.689/1200) = ~1.054389... > (19/18) ~91.1386239...C
> D 2: 2^(196.552/1200) = ~1.120228... > (28/25) ~196.198479...C
> # 3: 2^(302.375/1200) = ~1.190839... > (25/21) ~301.846520...C
> E 4: 2^(392.909/1200) = ~1.254771... > (64/51) ~393.089593...C
> F 5: 4/3
> # 6: 2^(589.342/1200) = ~1.405533... < (45/32) ~590.22371...C
> G 7: 3/2
> # 8: 2^(792.077/1200) = ~1.580152... < (128/81) ~792.17999...C
> A 9: 2^(897.524/1200) = ~1.679389... < (42/25) ~898.15348...C
> # 10: 2^(1003.508/1200) = ~1.785411... > (25/14) ~1003.8015...C
> B 11: 2^(1093.547/1200) = ~1.880725... > (47/25) ~1092.8791...C
> c 12: 2/1
>
> Attend:
> Each pitch deviates less than only 1 Cent depart from the original.
>
> That Approximation yields in terms of the 'scala' file format:
>
> !OzYarmanApprox.scl
> Ozan Yarman's 79-MOS-159ET splendid-beating rat. approx. by Sparschuh
> !compiled within precision accuracy of less than 1 Cent deviation
> !
> 12
> !
> 19/18
> 28/25
> 25/21
> 64/51
> 4/3
> 45/32
> 3/2
> 128/81
> 42/25
> 25/14
> 47/25
> 2/1
> !
> ![eof]
>
> Conclusion:
> Hence yours choices near to that reasonable ratios sounds well apt
> at least in my ears.
>
> bye
> A.S.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> You can configure your subscription by sending an empty email to one
> of these addresses (from the address at which you receive the list):
> tuning-subscribe@yahoogroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com - leave the group.
> tuning-nomail@yahoogroups.com - turn off mail from the group.
> tuning-digest@yahoogroups.com - set group to send daily digests.
> tuning-normal@yahoogroups.com - set group to send individual emails.
> tuning-help@yahoogroups.com - receive general help information.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

Congratulations Ozan!

It's wonderful you have a book in print. Now to get it translated into English, don't you think? There must be some way you could apply for EU funds to get it issued in English or German (a very large section of those who'd be interested would very likely read both languages).

-Cameron Bobro

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
> Dear members, take note please!
>
> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in print.
>
> This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the
> maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and
> comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.
>
> Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and
> Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam
> music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the
> Analytical section.
>
> Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor
> who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive
> beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse
> language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,
> third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-
> tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music
> in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.
>
> I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I would
> like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.
>
> Cordially,
> Dr. Oz.
>
>
> âo?=© âo?=© âo?=©
> www.ozanyarman.com
>

Thanks Cameron! I'm not sure about German, but I could easily overcome
the translation-to-English obstacle. Will consider putting this task
on my agenda in the future.

Oz.

✩ ✩ ✩
www.ozanyarman.com

On May 11, 2010, at 8:10 AM, cameron wrote:

> Congratulations Ozan!
>
> It's wonderful you have a book in print. Now to get it translated
> into English, don't you think? There must be some way you could
> apply for EU funds to get it issued in English or German (a very
> large section of those who'd be interested would very likely read
> both languages).
>
> -Cameron Bobro
>
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>>
>> Dear members, take note please!
>>
>> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
>> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in
>> print.
>>
>> This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the
>> maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and
>> comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.
>>
>> Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and
>> Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam
>> music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the
>> Analytical section.
>>
>> Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor
>> who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive
>> beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse
>> language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,
>> third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-
>> tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music
>> in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.
>>
>> I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I
>> would
>> like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.
>>
>> Cordially,
>> Dr. Oz.
>>
>>
>> âo?=© âo?=© âo?=©
>> www.ozanyarman.com
>>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> You can configure your subscription by sending an empty email to one
> of these addresses (from the address at which you receive the list):
> tuning-subscribe@yahoogroups.com - join the tuning group.
> tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com - leave the group.
> tuning-nomail@yahoogroups.com - turn off mail from the group.
> tuning-digest@yahoogroups.com - set group to send daily digests.
> tuning-normal@yahoogroups.com - set group to send individual emails.
> tuning-help@yahoogroups.com - receive general help information.
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>

I played around a bit with the Bohlen-Pierce scale. Unfortunately (even with a Clarinet as a very odd-numbered timbre), I noticed a few of even the 3:5:7 triads did not sound so good and many other chords I tried simply sounded very tense.

Do any of your have any good BP tutorial links (maybe my mind is just confused and gravitating to the wrong chords?) and/or notice some problems with how BP works with regards to non-triadic chords?

Tutorials in BP

I suggest you go to xenharmonic allience and watch the videos of Elaine Walker performing BP music with triads, melody and all in excellent pop music. One should be able to pick up some if not all of it by ear.

Chris
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Michael <djtrancendance@...>
Date: Wed, 12 May 2010 06:40:34
To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: [tuning] Bohlen-Pierce and non-triadic chords

I played around a bit with the Bohlen-Pierce scale. Unfortunately (even with a Clarinet as a very odd-numbered timbre), I noticed a few of even the 3:5:7 triads did not sound so good and many other chords I tried simply sounded very tense.

Do any of your have any good BP tutorial links (maybe my mind is just confused and gravitating to the wrong chords?) and/or notice some problems with how BP works with regards to non-triadic chords?

Michael wrote:

> Do any of your have any good BP tutorial links (maybe my mind is just > confused and gravitating
> to the wrong chords?) and/or notice some problems with how BP works with > regards to non-triadic chords?

Depends on what you call triadic. What do you say to this example?
http://www.box.net/shared/c87ouyfbde

Petr

Still sounds odd "even" with the well-chosen timbre. For example, the 4th and 6th notes seem "off"...perhaps even just on the basis of root tone (IE disregarding any overtone matching). And I'd say 70% of the chords sound off...and I have faith you are picking "theoretically sound" chords. Maybe it's just me but I get this odd feeling BP, while based on a good idea (matching exclusively odd harmonics)...isn't all it's cracked up to be.
It really makes me wonder should the factors 3,5,7,9,11 have been used instead of "just" 3,5,7.

Using 3/5/7/9/11 and mirrors I get the following possible intervals (a lot of which are from BP...but many which are not)
Note INV = inverse AKA mirror around 3/1.

1/1
11/9 = 1.22222
9/7 = 1.2857 (INV of 2.3333333 AKA 3/2.33333)
15/11 = 1.3636363 (INV of 2.2)
7/5 = 1.4
11/7 = 1.571428
5/3 = 1.66666666666666 (INV of 1.8)
9/5 = 1.8
22/11 = 1.9090909 (INV of 1.571428)
15/7 = 2.142857 (INV of 1.4)
11/5 = 2.2
7/3 = 2.3333333333
22/11 = 2.454545 (INV of 1.222222)
3/1

...which I figure would make creating a BP-style scale a process of picking any of these as roots and seeing how many dyads can be formed which match or near-match ratios from the above list.

Eh, my connection lapsed as I was writing to you, back again via PM tomorrow on this, good night all!

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks Cameron! I'm not sure about German, but I could easily overcome
> the translation-to-English obstacle. Will consider putting this task
> on my agenda in the future.
>
> Oz.
>
> âo?=© âo?=© âo?=©
> www.ozanyarman.com
>
> On May 11, 2010, at 8:10 AM, cameron wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Ozan!
> >
> > It's wonderful you have a book in print. Now to get it translated
> > into English, don't you think? There must be some way you could
> > apply for EU funds to get it issued in English or German (a very
> > large section of those who'd be interested would very likely read
> > both languages).
> >
> > -Cameron Bobro
> >
> > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear members, take note please!
> >>
> >> My first publication, titled (in Turkish): "New Horizons in Our Pitch
> >> Universe - From The Dimension of Theory and Technique" is now in
> >> print.
> >>
> >> This book contains my tuning and theory related endeavours on the
> >> maqam tradition spanning the last 10 years of my academic career and
> >> comprises critiques against my "local rivals" in the field.
> >>
> >> Therein is included three tone-systems (79 MOS 159-tET, Yarman-24 and
> >> Yarman-36) to explain the subtle nuances of pitch in Turkish Maqam
> >> music at three different levels of discreteness. This is the
> >> Analytical section.
> >>
> >> Therein is also included three critiques against first: a Professor
> >> who claims that one need not hear two pitches together to perceive
> >> beats, second: a famous Maqam music composer whose rather coarse
> >> language and agenda gives away his over-nationalistic sentiments,
> >> third: an overbearing Jazz musician who took it a fancy to peddle 48-
> >> tone Equal Temperament as a great innovation for Turkish Maqam music
> >> in all due theoretical incompetence. This is the Critique section.
> >>
> >> I had much joy and fun when the paperback arrived in my hands. I
> >> would
> >> like to share this moment of pride with my colleagues on the lists.
> >>
> >> Cordially,
> >> Dr. Oz.
> >>
> >>
> >> âo?=© âo?=© âo?=©
> >> www.ozanyarman.com
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > You can configure your subscription by sending an empty email to one
> > of these addresses (from the address at which you receive the list):
> > tuning-subscribe@yahoogroups.com - join the tuning group.
> > tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com - leave the group.
> > tuning-nomail@yahoogroups.com - turn off mail from the group.
> > tuning-digest@yahoogroups.com - set group to send daily digests.
> > tuning-normal@yahoogroups.com - set group to send individual emails.
> > tuning-help@yahoogroups.com - receive general help information.
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
>