One for the fridge! Thanks Paul and Graham.

Paul Erlich wrote:

>Graham, do you see any problem with your table given that 34-tET is not
>consistent in the 7-limit?

No. The fact that it supports two different 7-limit mappings is entirely
consistent with its inconsistency. It supports both of them equally
badly, and so is the worst possible 7-limit super-Pythagorean, except for
silly ones.