A more stereophonic rendition of my porcupine piece

Hi again,

some of you probably have heard my recent piece in porcupine. A few days ago, I panned some of the instruments more to the left and others more to the rigth and soon I realized that now that the stereo field was not so "full of sound" as in the previous version, I could happily add more instruments without being afraid of too much sound. Here's the "updated" version:
www.sendspace.com/file/vtlns4

Petr

Thanks, this is nice (first time I've heard it, btw). And I can never get instrument panning the way I want, so I rarely bother with it. ~D.

----- Original Message -----
From: Petr Pařízek
To: tuning@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, 01 June, 2009 03:12
Subject: [tuning] A more stereophonic rendition of my porcupine piece



Hi again,

some of you probably have heard my recent piece in porcupine. A few days ago, I panned some of the instruments more to the left and others more to the rigth and soon I realized that now that the stereo field was not so "full of sound" as in the previous version, I could happily add more instruments without being afraid of too much sound. Here's the "updated" version:
www.sendspace.com/file/vtlns4

Petr

Danny Wier wrote:

> Thanks, this is nice (first time I've heard it, btw).
> And I can never get instrument panning the way I want, so I rarely bother with it. ~D.

Well, so do I, to be honest. --Interestingly enough, once I have made these changes, I realized it may be pretty easy for someone to listen to some of the tracks more carefully because you can just subtract the left and right channel contents -- I’ve tried that myself and I almost started laughing about how clearly I could hear many things then, which means that other people could actually learn the piece -- it really works. :-D

Petr