back to list

[tuning] Beethoven Drei Equali in JI.

🔗Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

3/23/2009 2:17:15 AM

/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_JI_trombone.mid
/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_12tet_trombone.mid

/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_JI_organ.mid
/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_12tet_organ.mid

/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_JI_harmonica.mid
/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_12tet_harmonica.mid

Have not yet made a proper transcription or analysis. (And these midis may
or may not contain errors.)
Am a bit overworked at the moment and need a few days rest, will make one
later.
Till then here are the scanned score and my scala sequence file:
/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/Beethoven_3equali_score.pdf
/tuning/files/Marcel/Beethoven/3equali1_JI.seq

Marcel

🔗Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

3/23/2009 7:25:20 AM

Ok.. I did it again..Posted too soon.
I now see the correct solution (in some ways close to what I posted above)
Will make it soon.
So the above thing is wrong.
I'll leave it up there till I post the correct version.

Marcel

🔗Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

3/23/2009 9:38:00 AM

Did a quick rendering of the beginning of the correct version and updated
the files that are linked in the first post.So the files are now correct
(including Scala sequence file) but are of the beginning only.

The sound of the correct version is very very grave I love it!!!
It also works exactly according to my theory :)

I had actually tried this one before, thinking it up at night one night then
got out of bed and tried it and upon hearing the grave sound of the first
chord though I was wrong and abandoned it. Pffff stupid me.
Glad I gave it a second chance after getting depressed about the previous
version not making much sense in my theory.

Don't have the time or energy today to finish the whole piece (overworked
and the flu again) but will do so tomorrow or the day after

Marcel

2009/3/23 Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

> Ok.. I did it again..Posted too soon.
> I now see the correct solution (in some ways close to what I posted above)
> Will make it soon.
> So the above thing is wrong.
> I'll leave it up there till I post the correct version.
>
> Marcel
>

🔗Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

3/23/2009 1:40:38 PM

ah i'm removing the files agian this one isn't ok aswell.the trouble i'm
having now is that it seems to me that the first chord has to be not 1/1 4/3
8/5. the 8/5 sounds too high to me.
but 1/1 4/3 128/81 makes not much sense.
1/1 4/3 25/16 does as it's 6/5 8/5 15/8 but idduno.
there are just so many ways to make this comma shift work even when seeing
it as 1/1 4/3 8/5, let alone the posibilities of other chords.
posted too soon, will work on it a bit more later.

marcel

🔗Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

3/23/2009 2:29:20 PM

Made a different version quickly with 1/1 4/3 8/5Put up the whole piece, the
links in the first post work again now.
It very probably contains errors but is pretty listenable.
I'll go have a serious go at it later but right now i'm so fed up with this
piece i'm going to work on another piece first. so will revisit this one in
a week or so
Will make a transcription then too.

I'm curious how other people did on this piece.
Can you post the ones you have Carl?
Thanks.

Marcel

2009/3/23 Marcel de Velde <m.develde@...>

> ah i'm removing the files agian this one isn't ok aswell.the trouble i'm
> having now is that it seems to me that the first chord has to be not 1/1 4/3
> 8/5. the 8/5 sounds too high to me.
> but 1/1 4/3 128/81 makes not much sense.
> 1/1 4/3 25/16 does as it's 6/5 8/5 15/8 but idduno.
> there are just so many ways to make this comma shift work even when seeing
> it as 1/1 4/3 8/5, let alone the posibilities of other chords.
> posted too soon, will work on it a bit more later.
>
> marcel
>