back to list

Re: Rocky

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@xxx.xxxx>

2/12/1999 10:52:06 PM

>Announcing Rocky. It is still in low phases of development, but it is
>pretty operational right now. It generates only a csound score currently,
>but I may add a MIDI capability.

Oh do, do! My stars!

>The website is still unofficial, so some links may not work, but if you
>want, you should also check out my albums. Every one uses an alternative
>tuning or the another, and there is a pretty large amount of real audio
>files.

Nice site. None of the instruments links were working. Would like to
hear about your various guitars and what you think of them... Realaudio
sounds good (as good, I suppose, as it can). Was it just me, or did
I download two au files in 12tET a while back... A piano prelude and
a jazz ensemble thing?

Carl

🔗Peter Blasser <Peter.Blasser@xxxxxxx.xxxx>

2/13/1999 6:06:05 AM

Carl thinks that I should give my 22tet sequencer midi capabilities. Who
would want it to send out just midi note numbers and have the synthesizer
handle the tuning? Who thinks it should generate files with the classic
pitch-bend/channel technique?

-Peter

🔗Gary Morrison <mr88cet@xxxxx.xxxx>

2/13/1999 12:46:58 PM

> Who
> would want it to send out just midi note numbers and have the synthesizer
> handle the tuning?

That's the way I always work.

🔗fasano@xxxxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

2/15/1999 7:26:34 AM

At 09:06 AM 2/13/99 -0500, you wrote:
>From: Peter Blasser <Peter.Blasser@oberlin.edu>
>
>Carl thinks that I should give my 22tet sequencer midi capabilities. Who
>would want it to send out just midi note numbers and have the synthesizer
>handle the tuning? Who thinks it should generate files with the classic
>pitch-bend/channel technique?
>
>-Peter
>
>
I vote for pitch-bend/channel (or both!)