What?

> Mike takes again the reference of the failed equal tempered scale where ALL
> the tones are flat, it was criticized by its own adopter J. S. Bach and he
> also states that some of the Piagui flat fifths will be MORE out of tune
> than equal temperament and not less.

What?

I suppose that your interrogation (What?) is in conexion with "it was criticized by its
own adopter J. S. Bach" because the rest is part of your message.
J. S. Bach´s son declared that his father was not satisfied with the equal
tempered scale; somewhere I have this information.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> The above relations conclude that the frequencies and quotients that define
> the needed flat fifths that are criticized by Mike are not common numbers,
> otherwise the triad chord wave peaks would not have been aesthetic
> responses.

You mean they would have been.

¿ Do you deny that the graph responses are aesthetic? If so, there are two possibilities:
1) The transmissions of chord wave peaks have distorted the responses.
2) You are making a comic subject from the serious information given by the chord
wave peaks.

WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN AESTHETIC RESPONSES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Regards

MARIO PIZARRO
Lima, July 9, 2008