back to list

Some pentatonic scales in 16tet.

🔗robert thomas martin <robertthomasmartin@...>

5/11/2008 10:34:15 PM

Scale: 0-150-300-675-825-1200. Scale: 0-300-600-750-1050-1200. Scale: 0-
75-450-825-900-1200. Scale: 0-300-525-750-975-1200.

🔗Keenan Pepper <keenanpepper@...>

5/12/2008 8:11:08 AM

On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:34 AM, robert thomas martin
<robertthomasmartin@...> wrote:
> Scale: 0-150-300-675-825-1200. Scale: 0-300-600-750-1050-1200. Scale: 0-
> 75-450-825-900-1200. Scale: 0-300-525-750-975-1200.

I'm sorry, Robert, but I don't understand why you're posting all these
scales with no explanation. Are you saying they're special for some
reason? Have you written anything in these scales, or improvised in
them? Why is it important that they're subsets of equal temperaments?
Some more information would be much appreciated.

With apologies to Mark Twain, I don't see no p'ints about those scales
that's any better'n any other scales.

Keenan

🔗robert thomas martin <robertthomasmartin@...>

5/12/2008 11:33:15 AM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Keenan Pepper" <keenanpepper@...> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 1:34 AM, robert thomas martin
> <robertthomasmartin@...> wrote:
> > Scale: 0-150-300-675-825-1200. Scale: 0-300-600-750-1050-1200.
Scale: 0-
> > 75-450-825-900-1200. Scale: 0-300-525-750-975-1200.
>
> I'm sorry, Robert, but I don't understand why you're posting all these
> scales with no explanation. Are you saying they're special for some
> reason? Have you written anything in these scales, or improvised in
> them? Why is it important that they're subsets of equal temperaments?
> Some more information would be much appreciated.
>
> With apologies to Mark Twain, I don't see no p'ints about those scales
> that's any better'n any other scales.
>
> Keenan
>
From Robert. Both messages 76276 and 76272 refer to 16tet. By the way
have you noticed that the times posted with the messages is Iceland
time.