About EDL and ADO

Dear cameron , Ozan and other

If you have any idea about EDL and ADO and if you accept, it is very kind of you to send me for putting them in EDL and ADO pages with your name.:

http://240edo.googlepages.com/equaldivisionsoflength(edl)
http://240edo.googlepages.com/arithmeticrationaldivisionsofoctave

Shaahin Mohajeri

Tombak Player & Researcher , Microtonal Composer

My web site?? ???? ????? ?????? <http://240edo.googlepages.com/>

My farsi page in Harmonytalk ???? ??????? ?? ??????? ??? <http://www.harmonytalk.com/mohajeri>

Shaahin Mohajeri in Wikipedia ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaahin_mohajeri>

________________________________

From: tuning@yahoogroups.com [mailto:tuning@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Cameron Bobro
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 3:44 PM
To: tuning@yahoogroups.com
Subject: 612-EDL and 53-EDO ; RE: [tuning] 612 Newton's, was 53 drawing, as an extension of Re: pseudo-Odo _dialogus_

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com <mailto:tuning%40yahoogroups.com> , "Ozan Yarman" <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Cameron Bobro" <misterbobro@...>
> To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com <mailto:tuning%40yahoogroups.com> >
> Sent: 08 Temmuz 2007 Pazar 14:49
> Subject: 612-EDL and 53-EDO ; RE: [tuning] 612 Newton's, was 53
drawing, as
> an extension of Re: pseudo-Odo _dialogus_
>
>
> > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com <mailto:tuning%40yahoogroups.com> , "Ozan Yarman" <ozanyarman@> wrote:
> > > Anything that voluminous would be accurate, no?
> >
> > Yes and no, what about your <.5 cents demand?

> It stands.

Good- but do you mean .5 deviation from your actual tuning or its
subset of 159 approximation?

> I am very pleased that 1006-ADO approximates Ozmosis splendidly.

That's the lowest ADO you've found? By lowest I also mean the most
divisible.

> 79+80*4=636

You lost me here, 636-EDL doesn't meet your demand at all, and 80/79
is not an embracing superparticular interval for your tuning,
whereas...other intervals are.

-Cameron Bobro