back to list

Re : Hot seat , moh-ha-ha

🔗Mohajeri Shahin <shahinm@kayson-ir.com>

1/31/2007 12:52:07 AM

Hi carl

According to :/tuning/topicId_68966.html#69333

Moh-ha-ha degrees are mostly found in 288 and 256 ADO (others are 192 ,272 ,368) , and it is interesting that 19/16 is the most common interval between them.
What about this rational well temperament based only on 288-ADO with very small difference with moh-ha-ha?
Mine in 288-ADO

1/1
19/18
323/288
19/16
121/96
385/288
203/144
431/288
19/12
485/288
57/32
181/96
575/288
2/1
You can see the graphical results in :
http://240edo.googlepages.com/moh-ha-ha.doc

Shaahin Mohajeri

Tombak Player & Researcher , Microtonal Composer

My web siteوب سايت شاهين مهاجري <http://240edo.googlepages.com/>

My farsi page in Harmonytalk صفحه اختصاصي در هارموني تاك <http://www.harmonytalk.com/mohajeri>

Shaahin Mohajeri in Wikipedia شاهين مهاجري دردائره المعارف ويكي پديا <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaahin_mohajeri>

🔗Carl Lumma <clumma@yahoo.com>

1/31/2007 2:45:32 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mohajeri Shahin" <shahinm@...> wrote:

When Magnus got your name backward on MMM, I felt like I
had almost gotten it backwards as well once or twice. Maybe
this is why!

Also, we are missing an "a" here, no?

> Moh-ha-ha degrees are mostly found in 288 and 256 ADO (others
> are 192 ,272 ,368) , and it is interesting that 19/16 is the
> most common interval between them.
> What about this rational well temperament based only on
> 288-ADO with very small difference with moh-ha-ha?

I guess I'm not sure what the siginificance of describing
a scale as an ADO if the numbers are so high as 288.
Especially if we're only using 12 of them...

-Carl

🔗Mohajeri Shahin <shahinm@kayson-ir.com>

1/31/2007 9:22:57 PM

Hi dear carl

Yes , shaahin is correct as spelled in farsi.
i think no problem with higher cardinalities of EDO , ADO and EDL systems as we can have a 12-tone irrational well-temperament based on for example 178-EDO with these degrees:

15 30 44 59 74 89 104 118 134 148 163 178

0: 1/1 0.000 unison, perfect prime
1: 101.124 cents 101.124
2: 202.247 cents 202.247
3: 296.629 cents 296.629
4: 397.753 cents 397.753
5: 498.876 cents 498.876
6: 600.000 cents 600.000
7: 701.124 cents 701.124
8: 795.506 cents 795.506
9: 903.371 cents 903.371
10: 997.753 cents 997.753
11: 1098.876 cents 1098.876
12: 2/1 1200.000 octave

or this one in 571-EDO with degrees as 47 96 141 189 237 285 334 380 430 475 522 571:

0: 1/1 0.000 unison, perfect prime
1: 98.774 cents 98.774
2: 201.751 cents 201.751
3: 296.322 cents 296.322
4: 397.198 cents 397.198
5: 498.074 cents 498.074
6: 598.949 cents 598.949
7: 701.926 cents 701.926
8: 798.599 cents 798.599
9: 903.678 cents 903.678
10: 998.249 cents 998.249
11: 1097.023 cents 1097.023
12: 2/1 1200.000 octave

you can see something about 120-EDL and Ganassi's Well-Temperament or 196-EDL and The Septenarius, Werckmeister's mythical tuning in :

http://240edo.googlepages.com/equaldivisionsoflength(edl)

Best wishes for you

Shaahin Mohajeri

Tombak Player & Researcher , Microtonal Composer

My web site?? ???? ????? ?????? <http://240edo.googlepages.com/>

My farsi page in Harmonytalk ???? ??????? ?? ??????? ??? <http://www.harmonytalk.com/mohajeri>

Shaahin Mohajeri in Wikipedia ????? ?????? ??????? ??????? ???? ???? <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shaahin_mohajeri>

________________________________

From: tuning@yahoogroups.com [mailto:tuning@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Carl Lumma
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2007 2:16 AM
To: tuning@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [tuning] Re: Re : Hot seat , moh-ha-ha

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com <mailto:tuning%40yahoogroups.com> , "Mohajeri Shahin" <shahinm@...> wrote:

When Magnus got your name backward on MMM, I felt like I
had almost gotten it backwards as well once or twice. Maybe
this is why!

Also, we are missing an "a" here, no?

> Moh-ha-ha degrees are mostly found in 288 and 256 ADO (others
> are 192 ,272 ,368) , and it is interesting that 19/16 is the
> most common interval between them.
> What about this rational well temperament based only on
> 288-ADO with very small difference with moh-ha-ha?

I guess I'm not sure what the siginificance of describing
a scale as an ADO if the numbers are so high as 288.
Especially if we're only using 12 of them...

-Carl