back to list

An improved 79-tone scale

🔗Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@ozanyarman.com>

3/23/2006 1:21:54 PM
Attachments

This was my original 79 MOS 159-tET proposition:

1. Take 1/33 of log (4/3) times 1200 divided by (log 2) =

498.045 divided by 33 =

15.0923 cents

2. Multiply the ~15.1 cent comma 79 times:

15.0923 x 1 = 15.0923 cents
15.0923 x 2 = 30.1845 cents
15.0923 x 3 = 45.2768 cents
etc...
15.0923 x 79 = 1192.29 cents

3. When the 79th pitch is completed to 1200 cents, A larger comma appears between the 78th-79th steps:

(1200-1192.29) + 15.0923 =

7.71 + 15.0923 =

22.80273 cents

4. When this larger comma is carried between the 45th-46th steps by key transposing the scale to the 33rd degree, a pure fifth at the 46th step is obtained:

(15.0923 x 45) + 22.80273 =

679.1523 + 22.80273 =

701.955001 cents =

log (3/2) times 1200 divided by (log 2)

5. Thus, a pleasing closed sytem of 79 tones made up of a chain of 33 meantone and 46 pure fifths is produced. Moreover, the ~709 cent Super-Pythagorean fifths allow for non-interrupted modulations from Rast to Suz-i Dilara at every key.

*

However, my argument with Paul Erlich proved that the above-mentioned meantone fifth was worse than the 19-tET fifth by half a cent:

1200 bölü 19 çarpı 11 = 694.737 sent >

15.0923 x 46 = 694.244 sent

This argument occupied me until recently, where I came up with an intriguing solution without compromising the structure of my proposed scale. Here it is:

1. Multiply a 2/7 comma meantone fifth by 33:

2/7 of log (81/80) times 1200 divided by (log 2) =

21.50629 divided by 7 and multiplied by 2 =

6.1446542 cents

log (3/2) times 1200 divided by (log 2) - 6.1446542 =

701.955001 - 6.1446542 =

695.8103467 cents

times 33 =

22961.741441 cents

2. Add to this number 46 times the pure fifth:

log (3/2) times 1200 divided by (log 2) and multiplied by 46 =

46 x 701.955001 =

32289.93004 cents

plus 22961.741441 =

55251.6715 cents

3. Originally, this number was 55200 cents, or in other words, 46 octaves above the reference tone. The error is now as large as a quarter-tone. To temper out the error, we need to temper the octaves thusly:

55251.6715 divided by 46 =

1201.1233 cents

4. Following the same pattern in the original proposal, and reducing all tones into one octave by the amount given above, we achieve a similar system where the meantone fifths are finally satisfactory. If A is the pure, B is the meantone fifth, the chain should follow the scheme given below:

ab ab ab aab

ab ab aab
ab aab

ab ab aab
ab aab

ab ab aab
ab aab

ab ab aab
ab aab

ab ab aab
ab aab

ab ab aab
ab ab

5. Lastly, we transpose all tones within an octave (where all octaves are larger by ~1 cents) and re-order them:

79 MOS 159tET improved
|
0: 1/1 C unison, perfect prime
1: 15.126 cents C/
2: 30.253 cents C//
3: 45.379 cents C^ Db(
4: 60.505 cents C) Dbv
5: 75.632 cents C#\ Db\\
6: 90.758 cents C# Db\
7: 105.884 cents C#/ Db
8: 121.010 cents C#// Db/
9: 136.137 cents C#^ D(
10: 151.263 cents C#) Dv
11: 166.389 cents D\\
12: 181.516 cents D\
13: 196.642 cents D
14: 211.768 cents D/
15: 226.895 cents D//
16: 242.021 cents D^ Eb(
17: 257.147 cents D) Ebv
18: 272.274 cents D#\ Eb\\
19: 287.400 cents D# Eb\
20: 302.526 cents D#/ Eb
21: 317.653 cents D#// Eb/
22: 332.779 cents D#^ E(
23: 347.905 cents D#) Ev
24: 363.031 cents E\\
25: 378.158 cents E\
26: 393.284 cents E
27: 408.410 cents E/ Fb
28: 423.537 cents E// Fb/
29: 438.663 cents E^ F(
30: 453.789 cents E) Fv
31: 468.916 cents E#\ F\\
32: 484.042 cents E# F\
33: 499.168 cents F
34: 514.295 cents F/
35: 529.421 cents F//
36: 544.547 cents F^ Gb(
37: 559.674 cents F) Gbv
38: 574.800 cents F#\ Gb\\
39: 589.926 cents F# Gb\
40: 605.052 cents F#/ Gb
41: 620.179 cents F#// Gb/
42: 635.305 cents F#^ G(
43: 650.431 cents F#) Gv
44: 665.558 cents G\\
45: 680.684 cents G\
46: 701.955 cents G
47: 717.081 cents G/
48: 732.208 cents G//
49: 747.334 cents G^ Ab(
50: 762.460 cents G) Abv
51: 777.587 cents G#\ Ab\\
52: 792.713 cents G# Ab\
53: 807.839 cents G#/ Ab
54: 822.965 cents G#// Ab/
55: 838.092 cents G#^ A(
56: 853.218 cents G#) Av
57: 868.344 cents A\\
58: 883.471 cents A\
59: 898.597 cents A
60: 913.723 cents A/
61: 928.850 cents A//
62: 943.976 cents A^ Bb(
63: 959.102 cents A) Bbv
64: 974.229 cents A#\ Bb\\
65: 989.355 cents A# Bb\
66: 1004.481 cents A#/ Bb
67: 1019.608 cents A#// Bb/
68: 1034.734 cents A#^ B(
69: 1049.860 cents A#) Bv
70: 1064.986 cents B\\
71: 1080.113 cents B\
72: 1095.239 cents B
73: 1110.365 cents B/ Cb
74: 1125.492 cents B// Cb/
75: 1140.618 cents B^ C(
76: 1155.744 cents B) Cv
77: 1170.871 cents B#\ C\\
78: 1185.997 cents B# C\
79: 1201.123 cents C

Attached are the original, improved and Lucy-improved versions for scrutiny with SCALA. Just type SET NOTA E79 to play with the chromatic klavier. The Lucy-improved will likely interest Charles, as it contains 33 instances of 300/PI + 600 cent fifths AKA the Lucy-Harrison fifth.

Cordially,
Ozan

🔗Gene Ward Smith <genewardsmith@coolgoose.com>

3/23/2006 2:09:21 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Ozan Yarman" <ozanyarman@...> wrote:

> 79 MOS 159tET improved
> 79

Scala doesn't load this. Are you sure it has 79 notes?

TOP tuning will also give stretched octaves for 159-et. Five limit TOP
stretches the octaves to 1200.3 cents, and 7-limit TOP to 1200.5 cents.

🔗Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@ozanyarman.com>

3/24/2006 2:02:57 AM

I don't know what went wrong, I'm positive there are 79 tones. Perhaps you
should open the documents with notepad and copy/paste the material directly
into SCALA. Then let's see what naming convention works for you.

Also, could you produce the TOP versions here in cents?

Cordially,
Oz.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Ward Smith" <genewardsmith@coolgoose.com>
To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 24 Mart 2006 Cuma 0:09
Subject: [tuning] Re: An improved 79-tone scale

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Ozan Yarman" <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
>
> > 79 MOS 159tET improved
> > 79
>
> Scala doesn't load this. Are you sure it has 79 notes?
>
> TOP tuning will also give stretched octaves for 159-et. Five limit TOP
> stretches the octaves to 1200.3 cents, and 7-limit TOP to 1200.5 cents.
>
>

🔗Ozan Yarman <ozanyarman@ozanyarman.com>

3/27/2006 2:42:09 AM

Maybe yahoo did not deliver my response, so here it is again:

---------------

I don't know what went wrong, I'm positive there are 79 tones. Perhaps you
should open the documents with notepad and copy/paste the material directly
into SCALA. Then let's see what naming convention works for you.

Also, could you produce the TOP versions here in cents?

Cordially,
Oz.

----------------

If need be, I can send the generator cycle as well.

Oz.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene Ward Smith" <genewardsmith@coolgoose.com>
To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: 24 Mart 2006 Cuma 1:09
Subject: [tuning] Re: An improved 79-tone scale

> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Ozan Yarman" <ozanyarman@...> wrote:
>
>
> > 79 MOS 159tET improved
> > 79
>
> Scala doesn't load this. Are you sure it has 79 notes?
>
> TOP tuning will also give stretched octaves for 159-et. Five limit TOP
> stretches the octaves to 1200.3 cents, and 7-limit TOP to 1200.5 cents.
>
>