back to list

some question

🔗Mohajeri Shahin <shahinm@kayson-ir.com>

2/21/2006 12:21:32 AM

Hi all

1- in mails it was written about tempering octave. Does it mean to have
octave more than 1200 or less than it.if so are these equations true
here :

(octave * 7)/12=fifth

(octave*5)/12=fourth

2- i asked this question because I am starting a project in tehran
university , music department, for measuring intervals of different
masters.it is obvious that the system is positive with maj.second around
210 cent and fifth around 705 cent.octave is also stretched.is there any
temperament based on octave?

Shaahin Mohaajeri

Tombak Player & Researcher , Composer

www.geocities.com/acousticsoftombak

My tombak musics : www.rhythmweb.com/gdg

My articles in ''Harmonytalk'':

www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000296.html

www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000288.html

My article in DrumDojo:

www.drumdojo.com/world/persia/tonbak_acoustics.htm

🔗Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@yahoo.com.br>

2/21/2006 5:54:19 AM

Mohajeri Shahin escreveu:
> 1- in mails it was written about tempering octave. Does it mean to have
> octave more than 1200 or less than it.if so are these equations true
> here : > > (octave * 7)/12=fifth
> > (octave*5)/12=fourth

The piano is tuned with a `stretched' octave (more than 1200 cents), because the inharmonicity of its tones. For example, a synthesized piano tone should use upper partials at about 5% (in frequency) above the nominal harmonics. The pitches (for a keyboard) are adjusted accordingly, to sound `in tune'.

Donald Hall's `Musical Acoustics' reports preferences for `octaves' of 1210 cents or more for melodic intervals, for both pure and harmonic complex tones. The same for sinusoidal tones presented simultaneously. But for complex tones with many harmonics presented as harmonic intervals and during at least 0.5 second, 1200 cents is without doubt the `in tune' octave.

--
'-------------------------------------------------------------------.
Hudson Lacerda <http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/hfmlacerda/>
*N�o deixe seu voto sumir! http://www.votoseguro.org/
*Ap�ie o Manifesto: http://www.votoseguro.com/alertaprofessores/

== THE WAR IN IRAQ COSTS ==
http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
.-------------------------------------------------------------------'
--


_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Gr�tis - Internet r�pida e gr�tis. Instale o discador agora!
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com

🔗paulerlich <wallyesterpaulrus@yahoo.com>

2/21/2006 2:11:15 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mohajeri Shahin" <shahinm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> 1- in mails it was written about tempering octave. Does it mean to have
> octave more than 1200 or less than it.

Yes!

>if so are these equations true
> here :
>
> (octave * 7)/12=fifth

Only true in 12-tone equal temperament, whether the octaves are tempered or not.
>
>(octave*5)/12=fourt

Again, only true in 12-equal.

> 2- i asked this question because I am starting a project in tehran
> university , music department, for measuring intervals of different
> masters.it is obvious that the system is positive with maj.second around
> 210 cent and fifth around 705 cent.

Fascinating. This may be the clerest statement made about Iranian tuning we've seen here for a long time.

>octave is also >stretched.

Then how could the fifth be 705 cents and the major second 210 cents? That seems to imply pure, 1200-cent octaves, since 705+705-210=1200. Unless this is a non-diatonic system you're regerring to . . .

>is there any
> temperament based on octave?

I don't really understand this question. But did you read the "Middle Path" paper I sent to you in Iran? That explains one of the reasons one might choose to temper the octave. Tempered octaves are also ubiquitous in Gamelan music and in the work of most piano tuners.
>
>
> Shaahin Mohaajeri
>
>
>
> Tombak Player & Researcher , Composer
>
> www.geocities.com/acousticsoftombak
>
> My tombak musics : www.rhythmweb.com/gdg
>
> My articles in ''Harmonytalk'':
>
> www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000296.html
>
> www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000288.html
>
> My article in DrumDojo:
>
> www.drumdojo.com/world/persia/tonbak_acoustics.htm
>

🔗Gene Ward Smith <genewardsmith@coolgoose.com>

2/21/2006 2:49:17 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "paulerlich" <wallyesterpaulrus@...> wrote:

> > it is obvious that the system is positive with maj.second around
> > 210 cent and fifth around 705 cent.
>
> Fascinating. This may be the clerest statement made about Iranian
tuning we've seen here for a long time.

It also suggests that the idea 17-edo is involved somehow may be on
the money.

> >octave is also >stretched.
>
> Then how could the fifth be 705 cents and the major second 210 cents?

Pure octaves seem to be entailed.

🔗Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@anaphoria.com>

2/21/2006 4:30:46 PM

Thanks for sending this Hudson as this has been my own subjective experience yet others had posted other findings. At least this puts the question back to being open for more questioning. Even though i tend to side with this one, so far)

Message: 9 Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:54:19 -0300
From: Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@yahoo.com.br>
Subject: Donald Hall's `Musical Acoustics' reports preferences for `octaves' of 1210 cents or more for melodic intervals, for both pure and harmonic complex tones. The same for sinusoidal tones presented simultaneously. But for complex tones with many harmonics presented as harmonic intervals and during at least 0.5 second, 1200 cents is without doubt the `in tune' octave.

--
Kraig Grady
North American Embassy of Anaphoria Island <http://anaphoria.com/>
The Wandering Medicine Show
KXLU <http://www.kxlu.com/main.html> 88.9 FM Wed 8-9 pm Los Angeles

🔗Mohajeri Shahin <shahinm@kayson-ir.com>

2/22/2006 1:56:03 AM

Hi paul , yes , I have studide your article.

1- you are right , but every thing is possible in iranina music !! my be
assymetrical tetrachords and so on .... And may be stretched form of a
kind of well-temperament with different fifths .

2- I think tuning in iranian music is related to the inharmonicity of
sounds. I have analized sound of tar,se-tar and santoor and so the
stretched octave and positive fifth of tuning may be related to the
inaharmonicity of sound harmonics.

Shaahin Mohaajeri

Tombak Player & Researcher , Composer

www.geocities.com/acousticsoftombak

My tombak musics : www.rhythmweb.com/gdg

My articles in ''Harmonytalk'':

www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000296.html
<http://www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000296.html>

www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000288.html
<http://www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000288.html>

My article in DrumDojo:

www.drumdojo.com/world/persia/tonbak_acoustics.htm
<http://www.drumdojo.com/world/persia/tonbak_acoustics.htm>

________________________________

From: tuning@yahoogroups.com [mailto:tuning@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf
Of paulerlich
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:41 AM
To: tuning@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [tuning] Re: some question

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mohajeri Shahin" <shahinm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi all
>
> 1- in mails it was written about tempering octave. Does it mean to
have
> octave more than 1200 or less than it.

Yes!

>if so are these equations true
> here :
>
> (octave * 7)/12=fifth

Only true in 12-tone equal temperament, whether the octaves are tempered
or not.
>
>(octave*5)/12=fourt

Again, only true in 12-equal.

> 2- i asked this question because I am starting a project in tehran
> university , music department, for measuring intervals of different
> masters.it is obvious that the system is positive with maj.second
around
> 210 cent and fifth around 705 cent.

Fascinating. This may be the clerest statement made about Iranian tuning
we've seen here for a long time.

>octave is also >stretched.

Then how could the fifth be 705 cents and the major second 210 cents?
That seems to imply pure, 1200-cent octaves, since 705+705-210=1200.
Unless this is a non-diatonic system you're regerring to . . .

>is there any
> temperament based on octave?

I don't really understand this question. But did you read the "Middle
Path" paper I sent to you in Iran? That explains one of the reasons one
might choose to temper the octave. Tempered octaves are also ubiquitous
in Gamelan music and in the work of most piano tuners.
>
>
> Shaahin Mohaajeri
>
>
>
> Tombak Player & Researcher , Composer
>
> www.geocities.com/acousticsoftombak
>
> My tombak musics : www.rhythmweb.com/gdg
>
> My articles in ''Harmonytalk'':
>
> www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000296.html
>
> www.harmonytalk.com/archives/000288.html
>
> My article in DrumDojo:
>
> www.drumdojo.com/world/persia/tonbak_acoustics.htm
>

You can configure your subscription by sending an empty email to one
of these addresses (from the address at which you receive the list):
tuning-subscribe@yahoogroups.com - join the tuning group.
tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com - leave the group.
tuning-nomail@yahoogroups.com - turn off mail from the group.
tuning-digest@yahoogroups.com - set group to send daily digests.
tuning-normal@yahoogroups.com - set group to send individual emails.
tuning-help@yahoogroups.com - receive general help information.

SPONSORED LINKS

Music education
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Music+education&w1=Music+education&
w2=Music+production+education&w3=Music+education+degree&w4=Degree+educat
ion+music+online&w5=Music+business+education&w6=Music+education+online&c
=6&s=174&.sig=zMNRfOOOdo7nVqxhYS_0Yg>

Music production education
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Music+production+education&w1=Music
+education&w2=Music+production+education&w3=Music+education+degree&w4=De
gree+education+music+online&w5=Music+business+education&w6=Music+educati
on+online&c=6&s=174&.sig=xvNPUlceIGAdVcjAsHH8JA>

Music education degree
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Music+education+degree&w1=Music+edu
cation&w2=Music+production+education&w3=Music+education+degree&w4=Degree
+education+music+online&w5=Music+business+education&w6=Music+education+o
nline&c=6&s=174&.sig=lrDYh_-yrdu524mpql-csg>

Degree education music online
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Degree+education+music+online&w1=Mu
sic+education&w2=Music+production+education&w3=Music+education+degree&w4
=Degree+education+music+online&w5=Music+business+education&w6=Music+educ
ation+online&c=6&s=174&.sig=SVm8lC0-Q2tryy6Hv14ihQ>

Music business education
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Music+business+education&w1=Music+e
ducation&w2=Music+production+education&w3=Music+education+degree&w4=Degr
ee+education+music+online&w5=Music+business+education&w6=Music+education
+online&c=6&s=174&.sig=pCxzd_uR0dRaYO3MB1Fpvw>

Music education online
<http://groups.yahoo.com/gads?t=ms&k=Music+education+online&w1=Music+edu
cation&w2=Music+production+education&w3=Music+education+degree&w4=Degree
+education+music+online&w5=Music+business+education&w6=Music+education+o
nline&c=6&s=174&.sig=DaqBb8P8ErSmB8MxxA-ePw>

________________________________

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS

* Visit your group "tuning </tuning>
" on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:tuning-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

________________________________

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@yahoo.com>

2/22/2006 10:39:17 AM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@...> wrote:
>
> Mohajeri Shahin escreveu:
> > 1- in mails it was written about tempering octave. Does it mean to have
> > octave more than 1200 or less than it.if so are these equations true
> > here :
> >
> > (octave * 7)/12=fifth
> >
> > (octave*5)/12=fourth
>
> The piano is tuned with a `stretched' octave (more than 1200 cents),
> because the inharmonicity of its tones. For example, a synthesized piano
> tone should use upper partials at about 5% (in frequency) above the
> nominal harmonics.

That just gives you a harmonic timbre at a slightly higher pitch. I don't think you meant "in frequency". And the inharmonicity goes up as the *square* of the harmonic number in piano strings.

> The pitches (for a keyboard) are adjusted
> accordingly, to sound `in tune'.
>
> Donald Hall's `Musical Acoustics' reports preferences for `octaves' of
> 1210 cents or more for melodic intervals, for both pure and harmonic
> complex tones. The same for sinusoidal tones presented simultaneously.
> But for complex tones with many harmonics presented as harmonic
> intervals and during at least 0.5 second, 1200 cents is without doubt
> the `in tune' octave.
>
> --
> '-------------------------------------------------------------------.
> Hudson Lacerda <http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/hfmlacerda/>
> *Não deixe seu voto sumir! http://www.votoseguro.org/
> *Apóie o Manifesto: http://www.votoseguro.com/alertaprofessores/
>
> == THE WAR IN IRAQ COSTS ==
> http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
> .-------------------------------------------------------------------'
> --
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Acesso Grátis - Internet rápida e grátis. Instale o discador agora!
> http://br.acesso.yahoo.com
>

🔗Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@yahoo.com.br>

2/22/2006 1:04:30 PM

wallyesterpaulrus escreveu:
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@...> wrote:
[...]
>> The piano is tuned with a `stretched' octave (more than 1200
>> cents), because the inharmonicity of its tones. For example, a
>> synthesized piano tone should use upper partials at about 5% (in
>> frequency) above the nominal harmonics.
> > > That just gives you a harmonic timbre at a slightly higher pitch. I
> don't think you meant "in frequency". And the inharmonicity goes up
> as the *square* of the harmonic number in piano strings.

Oops, not `frequencies' but `frequency ratios' instead: multiply the pseudo-harmonics numbers by 1.05 to get its frequency ratios.

--
'-------------------------------------------------------------------.
Hudson Lacerda <http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/hfmlacerda/>
*N�o deixe seu voto sumir! http://www.votoseguro.org/
*Ap�ie o Manifesto: http://www.votoseguro.com/alertaprofessores/

== THE WAR IN IRAQ COSTS ==
http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
.-------------------------------------------------------------------'
--


_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Gr�tis - Internet r�pida e gr�tis. Instale o discador agora!
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@yahoo.com>

2/22/2006 1:44:21 PM

1209 cents is the number I usually cite on this list, though it
changes quite a bit depending on register.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@...> wrote:
>
> Thanks for sending this Hudson as this has been my own subjective
> experience yet others had posted other findings. At least this puts
the
> question back to being open for more questioning. Even though i
tend to
> side with this one, so far)
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:54:19 -0300
> From: Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@...>
> Subject:
>
>
>
>
> Donald Hall's `Musical Acoustics' reports preferences for `octaves'
of
> 1210 cents or more for melodic intervals, for both pure and
harmonic
> complex tones. The same for sinusoidal tones presented
simultaneously.
> But for complex tones with many harmonics presented as harmonic
> intervals and during at least 0.5 second, 1200 cents is without
doubt
> the `in tune' octave.
>
> --
> Kraig Grady
> North American Embassy of Anaphoria Island <http://anaphoria.com/>
> The Wandering Medicine Show
> KXLU <http://www.kxlu.com/main.html> 88.9 FM Wed 8-9 pm Los Angeles
>

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@yahoo.com>

2/22/2006 2:39:42 PM

Thanks for your replies.

Plucked strings have slightly stretched harmonics, but 705-cent
fifths are still hard to find unless you go quite high in the
harmonic series, well beyond the second and third harmonics which are
the strongest spectral determinants of the fifth.

By contrast, bowed strings, wind instruments, and the human voice
have exactly harmonic overtones.

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Mohajeri Shahin" <shahinm@...> wrote:
>
> Hi paul , yes , I have studide your article.
>
> 1- you are right , but every thing is possible in iranina music !!
my be
> assymetrical tetrachords and so on .... And may be stretched form
of a
> kind of well-temperament with different fifths .
>
> 2- I think tuning in iranian music is related to the inharmonicity
of
> sounds. I have analized sound of tar,se-tar and santoor and so the
> stretched octave and positive fifth of tuning may be related to the
> inaharmonicity of sound harmonics.

🔗wallyesterpaulrus <wallyesterpaulrus@yahoo.com>

2/22/2006 3:31:15 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@...> wrote:
>
> wallyesterpaulrus escreveu:
> > --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@> wrote:
> [...]
> >> The piano is tuned with a `stretched' octave (more than 1200
> >> cents), because the inharmonicity of its tones. For example, a
> >> synthesized piano tone should use upper partials at about 5% (in
> >> frequency) above the nominal harmonics.
> >
> >
> > That just gives you a harmonic timbre at a slightly higher pitch. I
> > don't think you meant "in frequency". And the inharmonicity goes up
> > as the *square* of the harmonic number in piano strings.
>
> Oops, not `frequencies' but `frequency ratios' instead: multiply the
> pseudo-harmonics numbers by 1.05 to get its frequency ratios.

Again, this just gives you a harmonic timbre at a slightly higher pitch.

🔗Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@yahoo.com.br>

2/22/2006 4:57:52 PM

wallyesterpaulrus escreveu:
> --- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@...> wrote:
> >>wallyesterpaulrus escreveu:
>>
>>>--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, Hudson Lacerda <hfmlacerda@> wrote:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>>>The piano is tuned with a `stretched' octave (more than 1200
>>>>cents), because the inharmonicity of its tones. For example, a
>>>>synthesized piano tone should use upper partials at about 5% (in
>>>>frequency) above the nominal harmonics.
>>>
>>>
>>>That just gives you a harmonic timbre at a slightly higher pitch. I
>>>don't think you meant "in frequency". And the inharmonicity goes up
>>>as the *square* of the harmonic number in piano strings.
>>
>>Oops, not `frequencies' but `frequency ratios' instead: multiply the >>pseudo-harmonics numbers by 1.05 to get its frequency ratios.
> > > Again, this just gives you a harmonic timbre at a slightly higher pitch.

Oooooops!!! :-) Now I found my mistake: that rate of 5% was to be used in FM synthesis. (5% of carrier frequency is added to modulation frequencies in an example by Bill Schottstaedt.)

Cheers,

--
'-------------------------------------------------------------------.
Hudson Lacerda <http://geocities.yahoo.com.br/hfmlacerda/>
*N�o deixe seu voto sumir! http://www.votoseguro.org/
*Ap�ie o Manifesto: http://www.votoseguro.com/alertaprofessores/

== THE WAR IN IRAQ COSTS ==
http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
.-------------------------------------------------------------------'
--


_______________________________________________________
Yahoo! Acesso Gr�tis - Internet r�pida e gr�tis. Instale o discador agora!
http://br.acesso.yahoo.com