back to list

Re: Ive's "poly-everything approach"

🔗Zhang2323@xxx.xxx

11/27/1999 7:38:54 PM

In a message dated 11/27/1999 10:44:22 PM, stearns@capecod.net wrote:

>And I wouldn't be at all surprised if
>
>others elsewhere (inspired by the implications of Ives'
>
>poly-everything approach) have tried similar things.
>

Talking of polymicrotonality....
I am currently working out a "mutant mix" scale made from
of (get this):
- primitive Pelog (cents: 102, 258, 522,
678, 780, 936, 1176)
- Pelog in JI intervals of 31, 37 & 59
- Pelog in pitches from 9 & 27tET

combined with:
- a JI version of hemiolic chromatic
- parachromatic (cents: 83.333, 166.667,
500, 700, 783.333, 866.667, 1200)
- a 27tET version of both hemiolic chromatic
and parachromatic

zHANg

🔗Patrick Pagano <ppagano@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx>

11/28/1999 2:15:31 AM

very nice prime vibes what's it sound like????

> - Pelog in JI intervals of 31, 37 & 59
>

🔗Zhang2323@xxx.xxx

11/28/1999 12:10:59 AM

In a message dated 11/28/1999 07:14:50 AM
>From: Patrick Pagano <ppagano@bellsouth.net>
>
>very nice prime vibes what's it sound like????
>
>> - Pelog in JI intervals of 31, 37 & 59
>>

From what I have done with JiCalc & a shareware
tone generator, it sounds quite alien & odd in comparing
with "real" Pelog & Lou Harrison's Pelog-like variations.
I like it a whole lot... I think I'll stick with just the
"bifurcations" & mutations of this Pelog-like scale ....
i.e. combining this 31-37-59 Pelog with a "bifurcated" Pelog
27tET variation ... best of both JI & ET "strangeness"...

zHANg
-Chinese-Indonesian
BBC (British Born Chinaman)

🔗Patrick Pagano <ppagano@xxxxxxxxx.xxxx>

11/28/1999 3:11:48 PM

send me a file I'd love to hear some
Pat

🔗Zhang2323@xxx.xxx

11/28/1999 3:18:58 PM

In a message dated 11/28/1999 08:11:09 PM,
>From: Patrick Pagano <ppagano@bellsouth.net>
>
>send me a file I'd love to hear some
>Pat

er, sorry, I do not have the means to ...
later - when I have my microtonal synth set-up -
I can make audiotapes...

zHANg