whose CS?

>Whoops, it appears I missed a couple of messages. I saw "Re: New Just
>Intonation Neck with Bent Frets" and never got the original. So I checked
>the archives and found this one:

That's funny- I think I've seen signs of missed messages, and I still get
the list in digest form.

>You can stop referring to Erlich-CS now, since the other examples of
>improper CS scales came straight from Kraig Grady.).

Paul, I'm sorry if I implied anything I didn't mean with this term. I
didn't mean to suggest you maliciously made it up, or anything. I just
don't think we can afford a single misunderstanding about which CS is meant
when, so to speak. I'd be happy to switch to CS and Lumma-CS until we get
a definitive answer from the Wilson camp. Actually, I will do that, since
you're the one with the original interaction with Kraig on the matter.

-C.

The missed messages did end up coming in.