Chalmers: good CPS explanation. error?

One good explanation of 'em that I read was in Chalmers' "Divisions of the
Tetrachord", of which I apparently bought the last copy (unless more have
been printed since last year.).

Apropo, I believe there is an error in the diagram there on page 116.

Should the top corner of the hexany not be "3*7" instead of "5*7"?
Likewise the botom right corner should be "5*7" instead of "3*7"?

That way, every line at a given angle represents the same interval, the
way lattices usually work.

cb

on 4/1/04 15:58, Chris Bailey at chris@music.columbia.edu wrote:

> One good explanation of 'em that I read was in Chalmers' "Divisions of the
> Tetrachord", of which I apparently bought the last copy (unless more have
> been printed since last year.).
>
> Apropo, I believe there is an error in the diagram there on page 116.
>
> Should the top corner of the hexany not be "3*7" instead of "5*7"?
> Likewise the botom right corner should be "5*7" instead of "3*7"?
>
> That way, every line at a given angle represents the same interval, the
> way lattices usually work.
>
> cb
>
There are one or two errors which John himself kindly pointed out in
response to my questions. That one of yours looks familiar.

Sincerely
a.m.