back to list

for Paul Erlich

🔗Stephen Szpak <stephen_szpak@hotmail.com>

1/2/2004 6:50:51 PM

Paul

I came up with a scale a while back (the Szpak Scale). Is it possible to get it into
the Scala list, or some other?

Stephen Szpak

_________________________________________________________________
Working moms: Find helpful tips here on managing kids, home, work � and yourself. http://special.msn.com/msnbc/workingmom.armx

🔗Paul Erlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

1/2/2004 6:52:49 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Szpak" <stephen_szpak@h...>
wrote:
>
> Paul
>
> I came up with a scale a while back (the Szpak Scale). Is it
possible
> to get it into
> the Scala list, or some other?
>
> Stephen Szpak

If you want it to be included in Scala, you'll have to ask Manuel Op
de Coul.

🔗Gene Ward Smith <gwsmith@svpal.org>

1/2/2004 8:43:33 PM

--- In tuning@yahoogroups.com, "Stephen Szpak" <stephen_szpak@h...>
wrote:

> I came up with a scale a while back (the Szpak Scale). Is it
possible
> to get it into
> the Scala list, or some other?

Carl asked me to submit a scale; the only way I've ever done that is
to post it to one of the tuning lists. You could email Manuel but
since he is a regular reader I don't see much point in it.

🔗Aaron K. Johnson <akjmicro@comcast.net>

1/2/2004 10:18:17 PM

Tuners---

I think I might have done an expanded CPS on the otonal, and the utonal, then
combined them, but normalized and rotated the otonal set, which adds '2/1',
and not the utonal set, which doesn't. Mea Culpa!!!!

Scala should really have a better way of doing these things, because it's
error prone and too manual...excellent though it is!!!

Best,
Aaron.

🔗Manuel Op de Coul <manuel.op.de.coul@eon-benelux.com>

1/3/2004 5:34:47 AM

Aaron wrote:
>I think I might have done an expanded CPS on the otonal, and the utonal,
then
>combined them, but normalized and rotated the otonal set, which adds
'2/1',
>and not the utonal set, which doesn't. Mea Culpa!!!!

>Scala should really have a better way of doing these things, because it's
>error prone and too manual...excellent though it is!!!

But it also forces you to understand what you're doing and that's
useful I think.
Anyway the dialog in the latest version has the delete option standard on,
as well as the normalize option.

Something to remember is also to "delete 0", then "normalize", not
the other way around of course.

Manuel