RE: Some alternate mappings for seven note 34e scales wi th two step sizes

Dan Stearns wrote,

>3x4 @:L=6 s=4

>0, 141 (212), (282) 353, 494 (565), (635) 706, 847 (918), (988) 1059,
>1200

>0 4 10 14 20 24 30 34

This is of course reducible to 17-equal. If you used L s s L L s s instead
of L s L s L s L, you'd be approximating the Arabic diatonic scale.

>5x2 @:L=6 s=2

This is of course also reducible to 17-equal and is the "Pythagorean"
diatonic scale in 17-equal.