Re: Titus-Bode-Arnold-Tomes law sort of

/cyclesi/topicId_unknown.html#6362

Hi, Ray Tomes.

I accept what you say, as in tuning and tuning-math the
relationships 14/15 and 28/30 are near frequencies in
cycles, and are obvious harmonics in relationship to
the rest of the cycle wave; also, the 14 and 28 are
squaring the 15 and 30 of the circle! Understand, in my
papers I pointed out in the 1970's that the solar-planetary
system is not static but in motion, and spherical shapes
and circular motions are what we observe in *outer*
as well as *inner* space [the latter in micro-biological;
and micro-mineral work, say in gem stones, leads us
to your 14 and 28 or Keplers dodecahedral shapes, although
there are others observed in emeralds, 6; and diamonds, 8,
for instance. Nothing unusual in all this, except that
astronomers and some astrophysicists *I-G-N-O-R-E* the
observable data to the peril of their own work!

Bill
Author of Arnold's Law
========================================================

--- In cyclesi@yahoogroups.com, Ray Tomes <rtomes@i...> wrote:
> Bill Arnold wrote:
>
> >I published Arnold's Law in 1979, as follows:
> >
> >Bodies_Proportion___Degreed Arcs___Fraction___Ideal Mean**
> >Or Perimeter
> >
> >Sun__________0___________0________0____________0
> >Mercury______1___________3_____1/120______3.14 X10(7th)miles
> >Venus________2___________6______1/60______6.28
> >Earth________3___________9______1/40______9.42
> >Mars_________4__________12______1/30_____12.56
> >Ceres*_______8__________24______1/15_____25.13
> >Jupiter_____15__________45______1/8______47.12
> >Saturn______30__________90______1/4______94.24
> >Uranus______60_________180______1/2_____188.49
> >Neptune_____90_________270______3/4_____282.74
> >Pluto______120_________360______4/4_____376.99
> >
> >*Ceres: prime representative of so-called "asteroids"
> >
> >**means: adjusted for diameters of both bodies, sun and planet
> >
> >
>
> Hi Bill
>
> I came to the conclusion that the distances are similar to yours
except
> that the outer ones are multiples of 14 or 28 rather than 15 or 30.
This
> fits slightly better to the data, and also has the very important
> additional property of fitting the compositions of the planets.
>
> In the harmonics theory strong frequencies are typically related by
the
> ratios 1:2:4:12 and we see this in the solar fusion process giving
us
> the sequence H1-->D2-->He4 and later -->C12 when the H is getting
lower.
> The elements are also preferntially distributed with the H1 on the
> outside and the He4 on the inside. The same compositions apply to
the
> giant planets which are on the larger orbit proportion. When we
look at
> the Earth we find that the atmosphere is predominantly N14, the
crust
> predominantly O16 and Si28 and the core predominantly Fe56. The 14-
28-56
> sequence is the same as the 1-2-4 multiplies by 14 - exactly the
same
> increase in frequency ratio as the increase in the frequency of the
> waves that explain the planets orbital locations. Furthermore, the
> frequencies of the waves that fit the planets orbits are also found
in
> solar oscillations demonstrating the existence of them.
>
> Regards
>
> Ray

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com