Reply to Jason Kanter

Thanks for your answer, but that wasn't exactly my point.
I saw the cents offset you mentioned and that's indeed the
only number that can be used without accumulating roundoff
errors. One extra digit behind the comma wouldn't hurt and
having the numbers in straight order instead of cycle of
fifths order would also be easier. I was looking for something
like this:
0.0 94.168 198.171 298.078 393.680 498.045 597.590 699.492
796.123 895.757 1000.033 1095.635 1200.0
Where 1/1 may be C or A, that's not really important.

Manuel