53 EDO imitation of Blackjack - Not!

Should have been a 54 EDO version:

0,2,5,7,10,12,15,17,20,22,25,27,30,32,35,37,40,42,45,47,50,52,(0

Thanks for spotting that one Paul.

Mark - wishing he could count sometimes...

Message: 9
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 21:26:39 -0000
From: "wallyesterpaulrus" <wallyesterpaulrus@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: Mark Gould's 53edo analogue of blackjack (was: 31edo version
of blackjack)
--- In tuning@y..., Mark Gould <mark.gould@a...> wrote:
> Thanks for the comments on the 53 version.
>
> I was taking the pattern
>
> 2 1 2 1 etc to 1 1 pattern and expanding it to 3 2. They aren't
equivalent
> for the rules everyone puts up for miracle. I was just looking at
the
> structure in raw EDO steps.

the end of the pattern still wasn't right, i think. look again!