back to list

Monzo's ET history

🔗Gene W Smith <genewardsmith@juno.com>

10/10/2002 10:23:13 AM

In the entry for 270 on

/tuning/files/dict/eqtemp.htm

we have

270 1970s? Erv Wilson and John Chalmers
1997 Paul Hahn

I found this along with the other usual suspects (441, 494, etc.) less
than 1000 back in the sixties, and I believe John Chalmers was even
earlier. I don't think the 70s date is right.

🔗monz <monz@attglobal.net>

10/10/2002 2:56:41 PM

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gene W Smith" <genewardsmith@juno.com>
To: <tuning@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: [tuning] Monzo's ET history

> In the entry for 270 on
>
> /tuning/files/dict/eqtemp.htm
>
> we have
>
> 270 1970s? Erv Wilson and John Chalmers
> 1997 Paul Hahn
>
> I found this along with the other usual suspects (441, 494, etc.) less
> than 1000 back in the sixties, and I believe John Chalmers was even
> earlier. I don't think the 70s date is right.

thanks, Gene. silly me, i'm good friends with John Chalmers
and could easily either email or phone him and ask.

should i add your name to the "270" entry? please give
more details.

-monz

🔗Gene Ward Smith <genewardsmith@juno.com>

10/10/2002 9:18:58 PM

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <monz@a...> wrote:

> should i add your name to the "270" entry? please give
> more details.

In 1968 my brother ran a program for me on a mainframe at Berkeley, which allowed me to study in detail ets up to 1000 for primes up to 31. This meant I found a lot of things which had already been considered but which I had never heard of (46, 58, 72, 94, 99, 171, etc.) as well as things which perhaps only John had previously seen--111, 130, 140, 224, 270, 311, 342, 441, 494.