FW: Response to Werntz at PNM (long and broad but to the point)

Yes the latter view! If the proof is in the pudding, she does what she wishes without much trouble

>
> From: "jpehrson2" <jpehrson@rcn.com>
> Subject: Re: FW: Response to Werntz at PNM (long and broad but to the point)
>
> --- In tuning@y..., Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@a...> wrote:
>
> /tuning/topicId_37235.html#38500
>
> > Hello Julia!
> > After hearing some of you music, it appears that the argument
> that 72 is so rich in JI appox. that it would not be the best for
> what you wish to achieve. i found no strong tonal implications so
> > in support i wish to say this criticism appears unfounded in light
> of the music being done. The influence of the context in which
> intervals appears is greatly overlooked.
>
> ***Hi Kraig!
>
> I'm not totally understanding the above paragraph. Are you saying 72
> *is* good or *is not* for her music, or are you just saying that the
> way she uses 72 it really doesn't matter, since the context makes it
> just as dissonant as she wants...
>
> Actually, upon reflection, I'm tending myself toward the latter
> view...
>
> JP
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 03:47:06 +0100
> From: "Robert Walker" <robertwalker@ntlworld.com>
> Subject: Seven to pi
>
> HI there,
>
> My piece in the eight sevens -> 4/pi MOS
> is now up at
>
> http://mp3.com.au/RobertWalker/Seventopi/
>
> A bit of info there and I've posted about it to
> MakeMicroMusic.
>
> Robert
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 10:18 +0100 (BST)
> From: graham@microtonal.co.uk
> Subject: Re: to Joe Pehrson
>
> In-Reply-To: <agaoh1+7fnp@eGroups.com>
> jpehrson2 wrote:
>
> > ***Well, I studied through it carefully twice, and would also like to
> > add that the musical *examples* are now on the Perspectives of New
> > Music Site!:
>
> > http://perspectivesofnewmusic.org/soundexx.html
>
> > (Don't worry about the XX at the end of this... whoops, sorry, Paul.
> > Paul wants me to limit my "sophomoric" er.. "humor..." :) )
>
> Then it's a good thing you didn't give the specific page:
> <http://perspectivesofnewmusic.org/Werntzexx.html>.
>
> Graham
>
> ________________________________________________________________________
> ________________________________________________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

-- Kraig Grady
North American Embassy of Anaphoria island
http://www.anaphoria.com

The Wandering Medicine Show
Wed. 8-9 KXLU 88.9 fm