re: Dan's under / over scales

Hello everyone,

I've found the general formula for the the scale trees
at any arbitrary rational repeat, and written this
all up.

http://tunesmithy.co.uk/uo_non_oct.htm

All observations - a mathematician wouldn't yet accept
it as proved, because you do get some mathematical
situations in which a result works perfectly for a very large
number of finite cases but fails at some very large
number. Doesn't seem too likely that this one will
fail in that way, but one still needs to prove it
(and often you get interesting insights by carrying
through a proof).

I'll have a go at proving it after I release FTS 1.09

Robert