I say 74-EDO is garbage, in so far as it is no use for anything that
couldn't be done with 37-ET. Anyone think otherwise?
--- In tuning@y..., "dkeenanuqnetau" <d.keenan@u...> wrote:
> I say 74-EDO is garbage, in so far as it is no use for anything that
> couldn't be done with 37-ET. Anyone think otherwise?
It can do meantone, and 37-et can't.
In a message dated 5/15/02 11:49:30 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
d.keenan@uq.net.au writes:
> I say 74-EDO is garbage, in so far as it is no use for anything that
> couldn't be done with 37-ET. Anyone think otherwise?
>
>
>
Dave, John Cage's "Ten" is in 74-tET, a 30-minute piece for 10 players, which
the AFMM performed a number of years ago. It sounds like the traffic sounds
that he enjoyed so in N.Y.
Best, Johnny Reinhard
--- In tuning@y..., "dkeenanuqnetau" <d.keenan@u...> wrote:
> I say 74-EDO is garbage, in so far as it is no use for anything
that
> couldn't be done with 37-ET. Anyone think otherwise?
you obviously didn't check my favorite page on the internet (pending
error corrections):
http://www.ixpres.com/interval/dict/eqtemp.htm
74-equal was advocated centuries ago for its excellent approximation
to 3/14-comma and 2/9-comma meantone.
combine that with the many interesting possibilities of 37 (every
other note of 74-equal), such as porcupine, and you have a mighty
versatile equal temperament.
didn't john cage, of all people, write a piece in it?
Many thanks to everyone who educated me about 74-EDO.
-- Dave Keenan