Jerry 10 post didn't appear

Well, my "Jerry 10" post isn't appearing, and since it's such a
crucial, crucial post, I'll post it again, just in case
Yahoo "gobbles" it.

In essence, I listened again to "Jerry 10" and *this* time, no matter
how I listened, the third went up (seemingly about 14 cents :) ) when
the 12-tET triad came in.

So, while this is not encouraging to the "high third" camp, I must
still confess that I'm a "believer" (Santa Claus is not far behind).

Seriously, though, I really believe that a "barenaked" JI third
without a fifth sounds *lower* than the third in a full triad.

However, in *this* example, with the 12-tET triad coming after, it
doesn't work for me. The third goes *up...*

At least, that's what happened *today!* :)

J. Pehrson

On 4/15/02 6:40 PM, "tuning@yahoogroups.com" <tuning@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 01:19:07 -0000
> From: "jpehrson2" <jpehrson@rcn.com>
> Subject: Jerry 10 post didn't appear
>
> Well, my "Jerry 10" post isn't appearing, and since it's such a
> crucial, crucial post, I'll post it again, just in case
> Yahoo "gobbles" it.
>
> In essence, I listened again to "Jerry 10" and *this* time, no matter
> how I listened, the third went up (seemingly about 14 cents :) ) when
> the 12-tET triad came in.
>
> So, while this is not encouraging to the "high third" camp, I must
> still confess that I'm a "believer" (Santa Claus is not far behind).
>
> Seriously, though, I really believe that a "barenaked" JI third
> without a fifth sounds *lower* than the third in a full triad.
>
> However, in *this* example, with the 12-tET triad coming after, it
> doesn't work for me. The third goes *up...*
>
> At least, that's what happened *today!* :)
>
> J. Pehrson
>

Thanks, Joe. I'll try it again myself tomorrow. Every day is a new day. :-)

Jerry