still on list hiatus

hello all,

just a quick note to say that (involuntarily) my own
computer is still offline. i'm scheduled to be reconnected
on Monday, April 8th. been doing a lot of work on my music
and webpages in the meantime....

-monz

--- In tuning@y..., "joemonz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> hello all,
>
> just a quick note to say that (involuntarily) my own
> computer is still offline. i'm scheduled to be reconnected
> on Monday, April 8th. been doing a lot of work on my music
> and webpages in the meantime....
>
>
> -monz

hi monz, great to hear from you! it's quite a coincidence, actually.

just a few minutes ago, i noticed that 217-equal was becoming hugely
(if not centrally) important in george secor and dave keenan's
intense discussion about a multi-purpose microtonal notation system.
so i posted that you had planned to do some midi mahler renditions in
217-equal . . . hope we get to hear these someday.

then, just one minute ago, i went to your et page and found *yet
another error*, under 36-equal . . . in fact, 36-equal *is*
consistent in the 5-, and even the 7-limit . . . andrzej gawel
advocated 36-equal for, among other things, its ability to supplement
conventional 12-equal-tuned triadic/diatonic music with 'microtonal'
extensions based on the 7-limit and on a 19-tone analogue to the
diatonic scale (we heard about andrzej quite some time ago on this
list, possibly in the mills days . . .)