Jerries

Hi Paul,

Okay, here we go:

Each time based on the first 1.486 seconds of data
(truncated from 2.268 secs to make the number of
sample a power of two)
- so there is no selection bias involved.

jerry0

233.938781 100 0
292.432713 99.6254368 386.368401
350.931109 99.1405648 702.068163
467.946676 85.766009 1200.25572

jerry1

233.935587 99.3713124 0
295.389562 100 403.809008
351.014128 98.5710453 702.501306
468.035478 85.0884136 1200.60786

jerry2

233.930099 99.3919094 0
295.454928 100 404.232676
351.008307 98.5644728 702.513212
467.949767 85.1261398 1200.3314

jerry3

234.014615 99.6569727 0
295.518194 100 403.977986
350.933734 98.8143106 701.520006
467.948496 85.4257568 1199.70134

jerry4

234.014387 99.8201421 0
295.541264 100 404.114815
351.009977 99.0050841 701.897772
467.95587 85.5754924 1199.73031

jerry5

233.935042 99.5393991 0
295.574966 100 404.899325
350.858436 98.6757076 701.737282
467.94665 85.3113867 1200.28329

jerry6

233.936738 99.4406115 0
295.475257 100 404.302657
350.858921 98.5785093 701.727123
467.946839 85.2099271 1200.27144

jerry7

233.936738 99.4406115 0
295.475257 100 404.302657
350.858921 98.5785093 701.727123
467.946839 85.2099271 1200.27144

Robert

--- In tuning@y..., "Robert Walker" <robertwalker@n...> wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Okay, here we go:
>
> Each time based on the first 1.486 seconds of data
> (truncated from 2.268 secs to make the number of
> sample a power of two)
> - so there is no selection bias involved.
>
> jerry0
>
> 233.938781 100 0
> 292.432713 99.6254368 386.368401
> 350.931109 99.1405648 702.068163
> 467.946676 85.766009 1200.25572
>
>
> jerry1
>
> 233.935587 99.3713124 0
> 295.389562 100 403.809008
> 351.014128 98.5710453 702.501306
> 468.035478 85.0884136 1200.60786
>
>
> jerry2
>
> 233.930099 99.3919094 0
> 295.454928 100 404.232676
> 351.008307 98.5644728 702.513212
> 467.949767 85.1261398 1200.3314
>
> jerry3
>
> 234.014615 99.6569727 0
> 295.518194 100 403.977986
> 350.933734 98.8143106 701.520006
> 467.948496 85.4257568 1199.70134
>
> jerry4
>
> 234.014387 99.8201421 0
> 295.541264 100 404.114815
> 351.009977 99.0050841 701.897772
> 467.95587 85.5754924 1199.73031
>
> jerry5
>
> 233.935042 99.5393991 0
> 295.574966 100 404.899325
> 350.858436 98.6757076 701.737282
> 467.94665 85.3113867 1200.28329
>
> jerry6
>
> 233.936738 99.4406115 0
> 295.475257 100 404.302657
> 350.858921 98.5785093 701.727123
> 467.946839 85.2099271 1200.27144
>
> jerry7
>
> 233.936738 99.4406115 0
> 295.475257 100 404.302657
> 350.858921 98.5785093 701.727123
> 467.946839 85.2099271 1200.27144
>
> Robert

ok, robert. all the examples have the just fifth (and octave, which
is a harmonic), so you're showing up to half a cent deviation there.
as far as the third, you had a couple of errors close to one cent.
take from that what you will.