back to list

Re: [tuning] Digest Number 1948

🔗Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@anaphoria.com>

3/6/2002 10:25:40 PM

Paul!
Yes it appears we have some variants which could be done in different octaves or the quick change of a tube. The other day he talked about using a 55 instead of a 56 also. His 22 tone shruti tuning he will use 7 limit variants also at times.

tuning@yahoogroups.com/Paul E. wrote:

> >
> > http://www.anaphoria.com/trans22.PDF
>
> it appears wilson is also using the 57:56 comma to construct the
> tuning, though i'm sure he doesn't mean the 57:56 is to be ignored
> (it's 30.6 cents while 1216:1215 is 1.4 cents) . . . perhaps kraig
> can tell us whether erv really meant the evangelina tuning to have
> different variants, one with 7/6 and another with 19/16?
>
>

-- Kraig Grady
North American Embassy of Anaphoria island
http://www.anaphoria.com

The Wandering Medicine Show
Wed. 8-9 KXLU 88.9 fm

🔗paulerlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

3/7/2002 6:22:46 AM

--- In tuning@y..., Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@a...> wrote:

> Paul!
> Yes it appears we have some variants which could be done in
>different octaves or the quick change of a tube.

what a great idea! evangelista implemented in this way would seem to
be the perfect solution for alison -- just cut enough tubes to
accomodate all the 19-limit tetrachords desired, preserving of course
the constant structures of evangelista.

🔗paulerlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

3/7/2002 7:58:50 AM

--- In tuning@y..., "paulerlich" <paul@s...> wrote:
> --- In tuning@y..., Kraig Grady <kraiggrady@a...> wrote:
>
> > Paul!
> > Yes it appears we have some variants which could be done in
> >different octaves or the quick change of a tube.
>
> what a great idea! evangelista

oops, that's evangelina, isn't it? sorry!