Re: Equiton again

In-Reply-To: <004301c1a50f$6bb98f60$af48620c@dsl.att.net>
monz wrote:

> /tuning/files/monz/Equiton/equiton.htm
>
> That's my terrible English translation of a Japanese webpage about
> Equiton by Tomoshiba Fuwa.
>
> But at least it shows you what Equiton looks like, and gives you the
> gist of how it works. (I had posted this here on July 1 of last year.)

Yes, I think I remember this. It seems to have the same biases as staff
notation, but less applicable to meantone. As it stands, it doesn't do
72, not that it'd be difficult to change that. So it's more a notation
reform thing than a way of tackling the problems of microtonality. As
such, I expect it's a great idea doomed to failure.

Graham