Re: 22 EDO Spectrum

--- In tuning@y..., "jacky_ligon" <jacky_ligon@y...> wrote:
> Harmonic Cents 22 EDO 22 EDO Errors
> 1 0.000 0.000 0.000
> 2 1200.000 1200.000 0.000
> 3 1901.955 1909.091 7.136
> 4 2400.000 2400.000 0.000
> 5 2786.314 2781.818 4.496
> 6 3101.955 3109.091 7.136
> 7 3368.826 3381.818 12.992
> 8 3600.000 3600.000 0.000
> 9 3803.910 3818.182 14.272
> 10 3986.314 3981.818 4.496
> 11 4151.318 4145.455 5.863
> 12 4301.955 4309.091 7.136
> 13 4440.528 4418.182 22.346
> 14 4568.826 4581.818 12.992
> 15 4688.269 4690.909 2.640
> 16 4800.000 4800.000 0.000
>
> Total Errors: 101.505 Cents
> For 1st 16 Partials

Hi Mr. President :)

I don't know what you're trying to do with this. Suggest a spectrum
that would make 22-tET sound just? This would work very well, but I'd
suggest leaving out the 13th partial altogether, since in your
scheme, some ratios of 13, if represented by their best approximation
in 22-tET, will end up with the 13th partial of the lower note 54.5
cents off from some partial of the upper note.

Now I suppose you'll accuse me of triskadecaphobia :)