back to list

McLaren is also intrigued by 33-EDO

🔗monz <joemonz@yahoo.com>

6/30/2001 10:06:50 AM

David Finnamore and I were both wowed recently by Herman's
33-EDO version of "Pachelbel's Canon"

I just came across something in a private email from Brian McLaren
that echoes our sentiments (the capital letters are merely the
result of output from an old BASIC program):

> FOR + 1/2 COMMA MEANTONE, THE CLOSEST EQUAL TEMPERAMENT IS:
> 33 TONES / OCT = .2927074432373047 CENTS FROM + 1/2 COMMA MEANTONE
>
> A fourth interesting point is that the above list gives a new reason to
> explore 33 tones/octave. In my experience this is one of the more
> intriguing equal temperaments, far more musically interesting than the
> numbers would indicate. In that regard, 33 falls into the same class as
> 9, 10, 20, 21, 26 and 27 tones per octave: these are all overlooked
> equal temperaments with plenty to offer but very little publicity in the
> theoretical literature.

-monz
http://www.monz.org
"All roads lead to n^0"

_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

🔗Paul Erlich <paul@stretch-music.com>

6/30/2001 5:58:52 PM

--- In tuning@y..., "monz" <joemonz@y...> wrote:
> David Finnamore and I were both wowed recently by Herman's
> 33-EDO version of "Pachelbel's Canon"
>
> I just came across something in a private email from Brian McLaren
> that echoes our sentiments (the capital letters are merely the
> result of output from an old BASIC program):
>
>
> > FOR + 1/2 COMMA MEANTONE, THE CLOSEST EQUAL TEMPERAMENT IS:
> > 33 TONES / OCT = .2927074432373047 CENTS FROM + 1/2 COMMA
MEANTONE

Yes, but Herman's version was not the 1/2-comma meantone usage of 33-tET . . . instead, it
used major thirds of 400 cents. It may be the great familiarity of hearing those thirds all your lives
that made that version appeal to you.

🔗Herman Miller <hmiller@IO.COM>

7/1/2001 5:17:03 PM

On Sun, 01 Jul 2001 00:58:52 -0000, "Paul Erlich" <paul@stretch-music.com>
wrote:

>Yes, but Herman's version was not the 1/2-comma meantone usage of 33-tET . . . instead, it
>used major thirds of 400 cents. It may be the great familiarity of hearing those thirds all your lives
>that made that version appeal to you.

Hmm, I hadn't thought of doing 33 as a meantone. I was even a little
reluctant to put 45 and 26 into that category, although they didn't fit
anywhere else.

I just did a version with 33-TET as a meantone for comparison. Even though
the thirds are flatter than the 12-TET thirds are sharp, it does sound
interesting. I added it to my web page under the meantone section.