Re: [tuning] Re proved-final stretch

In a message dated 6/10/01 7:49:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
xjhouston7@yahoo.com writes:

> But by doing so, we can all see that your
> claims in this list can't be taken seriously.
>
>
Bassoon.

In no way have I side-stepped the issues brought forth. It does seem that my
answers are not liked by some. The frustration is clearly on the side of
insecurity. As a result I come off as cocky because I am not insecure.
That's part of the professional's stance. I like to come off nonchalant in
performance.

Rather than condemn, try as Paul mentioned, to realized that even if I was
deluded and could only hear with a 2 or 3 cent accuracy, it still is not much
of a difference to what I say I am doing, because people can't or don't
register much of the difference, unless they count beats over time.

Even if I was deduced to be one way or the other, I'd still just be one
person in a sea of musicians. It will prove nothing. For me to give you a
perfect recording. But it sounds like you don't really want a human being to
play your music after all. You wouldn't be the first person to distrust
performers in playing their music. Stick to your electronics because you can
believe in them more. People make mistakes and perhaps shouldn't be trusted.
It's time for machines to play chess.

Johnny Reinhard

On 6/10/01 8:06 PM, "Afmmjr@aol.com" <Afmmjr@aol.com> wrote:

> I come off as cocky because I am not insecure.

Nah it's just your being from BROOKLYN.
BOYYYYYYYYYYYY