Re: The "bias" of a tuning -- also, caveats about 22 and 23

In-Reply-To: <008b01c1081a$d2e0bc00$4448620c@...>
Monz wrote:

> Thanks for jumping to my defense, Graham. Brian, I quote here for
> you something from my Dowland webpage, and if you visit the page
> and listen to the mp3 of Dowland's _Lachrimae_ *in his tuning*,
> I'm sure you'll agree that "there be wolves here":
> http://www.ixpres.com/interval/monzo/fngrbds/dowland/dowland.htm

Did you spot the <cough> deliberate misteak in my calculations?

Graham