Fwd: Re: Calling all British microtonalists

I got this from John Fitch, who I'm sure had another F before. Bath
would be very convenient for me.

From: J P Fitch <****> X-Authentication-Warning:
aoede.maths.bath.ac.uk: jpff set sender to **** using -f
Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 14:54:20 +0100
Message-Id: <9597-Mon14May2001145420+0100-****>
X-Mailer: emacs 21.0.100.1 (via feedmail 8 I)
To: tuning@yahoogroups.com
CC: graham@****
In-reply-to: <9doffb+d06c@eGroups.com> (graham@microtonal.co.uk)
Subject: Re: [tuning] Re: Calling all British microtonalists
References: <9doffb+d06c@eGroups.com> X-Envelope-To: graham@****
X-UIDL: _k3G.LO-_6.sulphur

(copied to Graham as I think I still cannot post to the tuning list
despite receiving it)

Oxford would be rather nice for me, having a direct and short train
link. I would offer Bath but I suspect that facilities are better in
Oxford; our university decided to cancel all music last summer.

As far as instruments are concerned, mine is the computer, preferably
GNU/Linux and csound, but then I would be more likely to listen than
annoy.

==John ff

Graham Breed wrote:

> I got this from John Fitch, who I'm sure had another F before. Bath
> would be very convenient for me.
>
>
> (copied to Graham as I think I still cannot post to the tuning list
> despite receiving it)
>
> Oxford would be rather nice for me, having a direct and short train
> link. I would offer Bath but I suspect that facilities are better in
> Oxford; our university decided to cancel all music last summer.
>
> As far as instruments are concerned, mine is the computer, preferably
> GNU/Linux and csound, but then I would be more likely to listen than
> annoy.
>
> ==John ff

There's nought wrong with annoying people. Musicians have been doing it for centuries. This man
needs encouraging.

Best Wishes.

>